CENTRO DE ESTUDOS E DEBATES ESTRATÉGICOS

14 abr. 2026 17:04 às 19:15

Sobre o Evento

O Centro de Estudos e Debates Estratégicos realizou audiência pública para discutir os impactos da pejotização nas relações trabalhistas e na economia nacional. Especialistas e representantes governamentais debateram a necessidade de distinguir práticas lícitas de fraudes que precarizam o emprego e geram evasão contributiva.

Status
Concluído
ID: 81341Total: 39 discursos
#28
Especialista em políticas e indústria - Confederação Nacional da Indústria (CNI) Wilson Correa de Araújo Neto
Wilson Correa de Araújo Neto

Especialista em políticas e indústria - Confederação Nacional da Indústria (CNI)

Transcrição automática

Yeah. In fact, Ricardo. And I just want to make the final considerations. First, I want to say that I completely absorb the words brought by Dr. Mauro Augusto. I would like to make a special note not only for Dr. Mauro like for Dr. Jane, who are not new people, to our eyes here at CNI. In fact, we have already participated, not only me, but also colleagues, we have already participated in other forums of debate, in some of the college in which we have part. So, these are people that we have a lot of respect and consideration. And I want to add here that it's a pleasure not only to talk with you, but with other colleagues in this dialogue of high level, And at the final point of consideration, I would say that the CNI reiterated that this debate about the prejudication, it doesn't start from the fraud, but from the respect to the objective, the security juridic and the freedom, of product organization, to the end of the event automatic presumption of the vehicle selectors, as I said, in certainty, even generalised. And in this spirit, colleagues, it's essential to recognize Eh, a diversidade legitimate of these forms of contractions in the country according to the reality of the dynamic of the work market. The pejotization, in this case, is considered as a contract between legal people and is a legitimate instrument It is necessary. and flexible and that stimulates to our own empreendedorism competitiveness and contribute to the informality. and the focus public our sense, and it should be much more in the amplification of this social protection for all forms of work. and not in the restriction, in the case, of the priority of the illegal legal laws. So, we're calling not only colleagues, but the Parliament, to recognize the jurisdiction of the STF, to prestige the good-fair contractual and legitimize these different contracts. evitando to our retrofit that creates the juridic security and big passives, without opening up the wrongs as I said by colleagues, the combat and fraud and especially protection of workers. So I thank you, colleagues, I have another commitment. It was very good to talk with you. .

14 de abr, 19:01