Charles Bruxel

And Boa tarde a todos e todas. Obrigado pela oportunidade. I think the great discussion that we have today in the pejorative and I'm going to talk with all the panelists. The problem is not the pejorative in itself, the fund is the question of this pejorative to be used as a instrument of fraud or a vínculo of employment. Even in the discussion that happens in the STF, it's been... It's a little bit like, "but the pejodization is constitutional." Yes, it's constitutional, but the pejodization is used as a instrument of fraudulento is constitutional? This is the true question. And the answer, which seems almost unanime, is that it is not. So, when we have a instrument that can be used legally, as a fraud, we have a series of problems. that were very well-resulted. In addition to the social issue in general, a subordination, a patron in practice, but not the rights of the work of the decorrent, we have a certain change. This person is not a good job, she is not a good job, she In fact, it's not going to contribute to the prevision, so it's going to be a problem assistencial. the person is going to the relationship, supposedly, between people juridically, without any verb rescisor, so she without employment, without verbas rescisoras, So they're in a situation of vulnerability additional, probably have to seek a occupation I or something precarious, because the person has no rent. So I think that This is the point. I think that our legal model, the legal model, it doesn't tolerate the use of any prejudice or any other legal instrument, which can be legitimate, as a fraud. And it's this thing has been generalized, unfortunately, in the economy. And it's that it's in debate in the Judiciary and now also in the Parliament. So I think it's important to advance and, in fact, it seems that the best ways pass on to make clear that the period of the period of the period can be used, but not as a instrument fraudulent. And then, of course, in which points the legislation has to be adjusted for this is something that final aqui dessa série de audiências públicas e desse estudo vai It's just these questions. Thank you. Thank you, Charles.