Vitor Filgueiras

I'd Thank you very much. A initiative, for this audience public so important, in person of the dep. Padre Couto, I don't know. and Obviously, this is the most objective possible here, and I'm going to try to do a conversation and proficuo, considering everything that was already said to not be repetitivo. Many things were already talked about the mazelas of the scale 6x1, the need for their aboliance, from the view of the health of the worker, for example. Currently I am a fundacentro in coordination of projects, so there are generalised scientific evidence in the sense of the need to reduce the job of the job, at least for 40 hours a week, for a series of aspects in relation to the charge, in relation to the incident, in relation to the physical and mental. So, having this consensus, I want to work with you here four very direct arguments, a part of a premise. What is the premise? of the work of the work of the work, or any other social and social rights must be implemented. We will not convene any empresarios, nor their representatives, which there are, unfortunately, the Câmara is a small majority, which has a sympathy and adheres to the position of civil rights and the right of work. So we won't convence any employees or their representatives, which are there. It's necessary, therefore, that we do debate public, and a pression generalized, that we gain the debate public, to impose about the Câmara, what happened last year with the income of income. It was a very well-suceded initiative, and everyone voted in favor, not because they were favorables to the income of this Câmara. the class of the workers, and it's because of the public constrainment that was created. This pauta, so, as any other question of the class of the workers, depends on the press of the public. In this sense, I will present four arguments, in the perspective of the public debate, pensando in what already said some people, and a famous economist of the past, that it is necessary to save the capitalists, or better, the capitalists, those capitalists, as they are, by definition, they look for the own umbigo, You can say one or another that has a more structured view of society, but the logic of the own umbigo. And a series of fundamental questions related to the argument empresarial, against the reduction of the jornada, as to any other right, in fact, they make sense from the point of view of the individual capital, but they don't make sense from the point of view of the system, so the individual's own capital is prejudiced when you adopt models of work, not civilizatórios. Portuguese here is more clear, retirada of rights, it can be treated as a individual capital, but it is a problem from the point of view of the reproducing system, and by the contrary, the advance of civilized work is something paradigmatic, it helps the system as a whole. Well, these four arguments that I will bring here, they have a respect, and this is a very very very very very telegraphy, they have a respect to how to help, in the debate public, a little bit of our capitalism, our capitalism is already degraded by our capitalists, which, as was very well said already in the audience, for people, and this is something fundamental in public debate. Any advance This is not to restrict Brazil, but here is a more dramatic thing. Any civilisation perspective on the right of social work is seen as catastrophic, as a caótico that will cause the destruction of everything. From the abolition of the slavery, passing by all the advances in the perspective of the rights of the workers and social rights in general, and the journey was different. For surprise, of anyone This catastrophe happened. And, by the contrary, the advance of social rights is fundamental for the functioning of the system as a whole. And the first argument is the most common of all, which is to respect to any debate regarding regulation of work, is to bring jobs. It's not a lie. For definition, the job of working for a concrete job. When you reduce from the blue to blue, or there will be a realocapable in the sense of increasing the journey of new people. So you will have more income in the hands of these workers, or you will have more payment of hours extra. So, more income with money in the hands of them. So for the individual capitalization, this can be a Degradação do trabalho, expansão da jornada de trabalho, joga contra a tecnologia. Os avanços tecnológicos dependem de pressão do ponto de vista the trade-off in economy, or decision of investment, it would be more the right to the empresarial. to extend the job, for example, or invest in technology and increase productivity. All evidence points that the more pressure from the point of view of the rights, regulation, increase the salary, the more incentive to invest in technology. Not because of the Brazil's business in technology. Not by accident. because it can explore the work of extreme, and our work is showing evidence in this sense. So, this plays a counter-amplification and the advance of technology to be degraded work. In the case of the contrary, the reduction of the journey will be a very strong incentive for the technical improvement. Third, obviously, the health issue, which I already mentioned, We are talking about something fundamental in the lives of people, as already said here, but also from the point of view of the empresarial, It's interesting this improvement of the workers because it reduces absenteism, which is a problem, from the point of view of the empresarial, and rotability, which is also something fundamental in the perspective of the learning curve and the productivity of the companies. Finally, and talking with the colleague of the Ministry of Public Health, we are talking about a fundamental question, the reduction of the giornata is very important, but The main element that is behind this, first, is a question related to the isonomia of the concourse to companies, The employees eventually it seems to be a thing of ironic, because a lot of them are prejudiced in the situation, and they even so support, or at least consent, to destroy the right of work, which is not respect to them. The job of the Brazil media has already been under 40 hours, so we have a serious problem of lack of isonomia. between companies, between sectors, between concorrents. And, concluindo, a question is that if we don't defend the existence of the right of work, therefore, the recognition of the unity and the symmetry between employees and employees, it doesn't matter how much we do it, if it doesn't be implemented, because there will be other forms of contractual fraudulent, without which there is no limit to the exploration of work. So, the struggle has to be for the right of work as a whole. Thank you.