Raiara Pires

So-- It's sweet. A vale Amarga. "Ay, antes fosse mais leve a carga!" between state and multinational states? How many "I"s? Dívida interna, dívida externa, dívida eterna. How many tons of steel we export? How many tears we throw without beer? I would like to bring this poem by Drummond, which shows the tragedy announced that is the mining activity. We have a legacy of decades of exploration, and we cannot allow, knowing those risks, we vote and approve new regulatory marks, new PLs, that bring these retrocesses to the next. National, the group of work on mineração, within the Frente Parlamentar Ambientalista, in the sense of building an instrument that will counterpore the bank of the minerators that are present here in the Câmara. We see that both in the legislative and the judiciary, the attacks are immense. The indigenous peoples have their culture, the quilombolas have their own way of life, the pescars also have a sustainable production. projects of death, projects, projects, as projects of development. I would like to highlight some of the challenges, not all of them, but that are put here in short term. The first is the GT of Mineração in the Senate, by Teresa Cristina, who was president of the agriculture agriculture, which brings there a question, which is the regulation of mineração in the indigenous land. for the people. For several reasons, there is a argument from there, that the minering that was made in the United States, in Canada and in Australia are examples of success. But let's look at the reality closer, let's put a look at it. What these experiences show us is that, first, it's about countries that, in their history of formation, were first constituted by the violent expropriation of indigenous peoples. has set different challenges for these territories that are claimed as great success. We will look at what happened. First, there was a exit of the state and a greater participation of companies to regulate public policy. they were forced to make a necessary adequacy of these towns to the extractivist logic. Because it is not possible to preserve agriculture, fishing, where there is minering. How will you fish if there are heavy metals contaminating everything? that we are working on the GT, is the issue of the PL 2780, 2024, of the senator Zé Silva. It's a PL that brings several problems in his text. The problem that I highlight here is that it favours diversities fiscails for the minerators. So, it's a sector that pays a few royalties, already gains diversities, and they want to expand even more. And it's not to be admired, this text doesn't mention the free consultation, the participation of the people and traditional communities. within the GT is to guarantee that they are included salvaguardas socio-ambientals and salvaguardas trabalhistas, and that this process has in mind that this international dispute, and the terras raras, the lítios, should be thought of a point of view of planning long-term. We don't need to exhaust all our reserves, and there are places that can be regulated here, it doesn't work, because there are indigenous people, there are aquifer, there are issues of family agriculture that will be able to do this land. So, we are in this panorama of lutas, in the Senate, in the Câmara, in the STF, and I want to thank, again, the ousadier of the land-of-the-terra-livre, because we know that it is a necessary fight and we will be firm. necessary, despite all the institutional racism, our access here It was done with obstacles, but we've been through it. And if they were to raise their voice, we will keep our altivez and keep our values defending our values, because our values are of life. .