Delmo Pinho

...deputado, porque ele é do Rio de Janeiro, ele vai ter carinho em nos atender, acredito.

which-- The situation of BR-393 is very grave and seems to be diverging of a solution. Huh? Yeah. The 393 has a surreal picture in any normal place in the world. would be unacceptable what is happening. The contract of concessions It was signed in 2008 with the Accion. After 10 years, in 2018, this contract was transferred by Cainfra. And this contract, when it was transferred, already presented an execution very insufficient and inefficient. First question: why is the NTT He agreed and transfer a contract so problematic for a company that had a capital A Cainfra is a small company. for a big challenge. Huh? This concessions had 10 years, had been perceived everything that had not been done right. So this transference, at the time, I remember, was very criticized and considered an adequate. I've been a lot of years ago, I was secretary of transport in the state of Rio and I was a secretary for more than one decade, Secretary of Teck. I'm very interested in the concessions of federal roads. So Cabe a question: Why did the NTT agree to transfer a problem with a company that didn't have maybe the capital necessary. something that was very criticized. Well, The result is that today In 2026 We have a a rodovia who received a caducity in a concessant last year. that is in bad state of conservation, not that she is in bad state, she is in bad state of conservation, And The union has 10 months with this rodovia Thank you. Why when this caducity was programmed, in the middle of the year, Why did the government not program the way to give a caducidad? There were two ways. The first one was a program of caducity. where you give a caducidad to the concessionary and obligate the concessionary to keep in the road, cuidando of the maintenance and operation, even if it was the case with a payback to payback no pleno or not, and then When a new concessionary You It's a certain amount of the need with the concessionary that came out. This would be the ideal way. because we know that the Unions have difficulty with resources. So it's obvious that there would be no longer resources, if there were time and time necessary, to recover the road. Even because when she was past in the middle of the year, the concessionary Caimfa was a problem at the execution of the obras, but it had a good level of maintenance and operation, as the prefeitos Apontaram. Huh? But we went to the delete and forgot about the users, because the situation of this road and the users today is much worse. than in June of last year. So the Unions had two ways to do this: which maybe was a good solution, immediate liberation or financial and finance, for the DENIT to be able to contract for emergency the maintenance of the road The result is that many people died, the economy of the region paid a price expensive, And we are seeing the Rio de Janeiro is prejudiced by its population, by a Ineficaz. And we are seeing that after 10 months we have only 10% of the maintenance services made until now Now, this was already in an emergency contract with the liberation of resources in June of 2025, it was to be all arranged in the street. And I'll say more: The $53 million that are available in the budget are insufficient to make this road to a reasonable level. Além do mais We're not talking about the pavement and the signalization. We are talking about the user who paid 17 years of parking in a concessions controlled by the Unions and that he today with the caducity made in my opinion equivocal or well planned, He doesn't have a gun, he doesn't have a ambulance, he doesn't have a mechanical assistance, he doesn't have anything. So, We can only push it to the concession that came out, which was problematic. A responsibility because since June of 2025, the responsibility is the Unions. And it's very aflit. I'm already concluding. There is no possibility of showing something with good sense to the control, to the TCU, to the Federal Public Service, to the Justice, that is in benefit of the users. that they didn't accept a combination solution and consensus. So there was, in my opinion, a grave And this sad mistake is that he is making people suffer many accidents. I think the minimum that the government had to do now, the federal government, was to liberate immediately all the resources and finance resources, for us not to go through three months and say that we passed 10% of execution to 20% or 30%. Thank you. There is no way to wait. So this emergency solution needs to have, just to conclude, The new model of the 393, the point that we saw in the studies that were made by the federal government until the moment, she will have much less works and improvements than the concessions of 2008, and will be able to 30 years So, in 30 years, when the new Concessions will be finished and finished, we will have less work than the expected in 2008, which also isn't reasonable. So what we are asking is: liberation orsamentary of immediate and dialogue with federal authorities, so that they can be able to know, in fact, the modelage. Why? There are poucas obras previstas, as we already saw, and a high-level budget of more than $15,00. Like Tom? It's what we wanted to put: asking good sense and emergency. I thank you very much.