Phellip Ponce

. Good morning to all, good morning to the deputado. Good morning, Mr. President. My name is Philip Ponce, I'm a advocate for the Brazilian Association of Syndrome Downs, and I'm a advocate for the American Association of Syndrome. I would like to point out some points. In relation to a person with a autism, he is equal to a person with a deficiency. Consequently, the Brazilian Law of Inclusion, she has a condition of being a person with a deficiency. So, in this case, we need to strengthen the Brazilian Law of Inclusion. We need to strengthen what was established in the Convention International of Directors of a Pseud. It's a moment in which a person with a deficiency, in a general, needs to be strengthened. The autism is a person with a deficiency. Does it have its specificity? It has its specificity. It needs to be worked with certainty, without any doubt, especially in various aspects. But if we work the Brazilian rule of inclusion, we will have a firm basis for developing these public policies we have talked about this public audience. It's also another question. The curatela and interdiction are a very serious case for people with disabilities, especially with autism. He is a autistic adult. There is now a law, the law 4, 2005, people with disabilities, until the civil capacity. We can't let that there is a cure for people with autism. People with autism have conditions, even if they are able to support 1, 2, 3, they can't be removed from the right of their rights. contract, you are going to be right. And I, as a person with a deficiency, I also have a sobrina with síndrome of Down. So, in the social movement, they, with certain, even in autism, adults, they want to have their autonomy, which they have. So, a curatela is a very complicated and prejudicial for the autist. And that's what I have to say. Thank you very much for for the possibility.