Reginaldo Freitas Júnior

. - But just go. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening to all of you. Mr. President, good evening. Mr. and Mr. Deputados, other authorities, the mesa and all the people present. It is a honor to participate in this public audience in a moment so relevant to the improvement of our legal framework. and that assume, deputada a very peculiar importance, because The proposal of this audience, in addition to sensitive, is very opportune. so that this debate is really dialogue, so that we really that the profundity of the subject that the subject requires. I really... I believe that a frank and intelligent dialogue is always a very important path to build good paths. For those who don't see me, since we are having transmission, I am a man of 52 years old, with a average of my skin, I have a clear skin. I have hair, hair, bigor, short and grisalhos. I use glasses. I'm wearing a terno, a bravata azul marinho. I'll ask the table to help me with the projection. along this trajectory, this debate of the last year, we see how desconhecidos we are, including the legislative power. And I think it's very important that I contextualize where I speak. I have the privilege of managing the Instituto Santos Dumont a project where I dedicate energy vital for more than 20 years. a project that is located in the Rio Grande do Norte, in a context that is very important to be pauted here. So It is a idea that comes from the scientific hypothesis of a ecosystem of social development can be mediated by the education, by the research, by the integrated extension, and that it needs to be a national responsibility with the demands of the country. So we're talking about a state with 3,3 million inhabitants, but with 285 million people with deficiencies. about 9% of our population, 8,89% are people with disabilities. We are among the five states of the federation with the biggest percentage of people with disabilities. of municipalities with more than 35,1 people with disabilities. a context that is pauted by violence interperson, by violence in transit and by conditions of with the for the normalism. Ah, tá. Obrigado. Mania de professor eu até prefiro mesmo, mas... It will be complicated with the colleagues. And... no, tranquillo, tranquillo, tranquillo. Eh... this idea I don't have not being the flexibility, not being the structure that this model allows. to think about this project, to think about how to intervene, research for this reality, we are going to get to the need of these people. Nasce a Center Especializado de Rehabilitação. Para montar o Centro Especializado de Rehabilitação, nasce a necessidade de formar as pessoas. Essa mão de obra não estava disponível para formação, para a contratação imediata. Vem a necessidade de fortalecer o SUS como ordenador da formação em saúde do país. E aí vem graduação, vem pós-graduação, lato senso, com a residência multiprofissional específica para o cuidado da saúde da pessoa com deficiência. came a degree in neuroengenharia with the idea of developing assistive technologies. And we realized that these products from the postgraduation of the Institucenso, the life didn't fit in the Lattes. They needed to get to the house of people, to the lives of people. And then comes, one of them goes to the other, comes a orthopedic, because the products of these work of pós-graduation need to transform things in concrete lives in people. from our country. I think it's very important to point out key I have practically certeza that the neighboring states, which are the four states that are in front of us, The Alagoas, Piauí, Ceará and Pernambuco are not different realities from ours. We're talking about 30% of these people who are not alfabetized. If we junt our people who didn't have concluded the Fundamental 1, this goes to 61% of people. So, there is no way to think about the health of people with disabilities without focusing on education. We open a line of care for visual deficiencies and find that less than 10% of the ceges children the metropolitan region of Natal, not be in the public school. And we understand that a line of care She could not start with an oftalmologist, she needed to start with a pedagogue and someone who could top up the assistive technology with a keyboard and a phone that the child has at home. We wouldn't have managed to a to make this happen, to catalysize the public policies. concrete in the lives of these people. We are talking about numbers, but it is clear to all of you and gentlemen that we are talking about lives, stories of people. without the strength that this model is. Why are I saying this? Why? I can't imagine Why is necessary, in this moment of development of our country, that there is the imperative of a decision excluding between the application of models to this or to that area. I don't have to discord you about the reality of the health. I am a health care, I have absolute consciousness of that the model is a way, as you said, necessary, without fault, irreversible in the application. And I understand, I was not who said this, it was Aristotle, that we need to have the rationality of treating the equal to their equal and the equal to their equal to their equal to their equal to their equal to their equal. I can't imagine that we can move on the legislative process without this guarantee of a model that don't try to uniformize what is not possible to uniformize. There is no homogenization, no same rule. that meets all these dimensions, because it doesn't have the dimensions of the act of knowledge, nor the dimensions of the continental country, which abriga 27 other countries in its reality. So it really is a step of maturing legislative process. Someone said that the laws of a country are its biggest expression of culture and civil society. Well, I think we need to move in the direction of a step in front of the civil society and the process of social evolution. I think it is very important that this clarity is in the heads of all of us. I can't, although I also lament a lot about the initial route that things took. I'm happy now with the energy that's here, and with the quality of the debate, and I feel comfortable now. But I can't imagine that we are on the opposite sides of a table. I don't know if you've seen that figure where someone looks at 6 and someone looks at 9 and one says: "It's 6", the other says: "It's 9". It seems that it's happening. We look at the 6th and who is next to the 6th can't be able to say: "It's true, it's a 9th thing." And I think we need this step. I think this is a very important thing. The integration, the research, the extension, today is a principle dissociable from the ISD. So we can't do it "Fazer Ensino". without, at the same time, making that the research happen there and the extension. A model that was recognized by several awards in the country, but more important than the awards that the program "Viver Sem Limites", "10 years of political policy", "Laboratório de Inovação" of the SUS, for addition to that, is the capacity that this model has as fortaleza to impact the lives of people. So I think I say that the federal diversity and the plurality of these areas, science, technology, health and culture, are required solutions different institutions. And what serves for a context in general, can not serve for another. I think that is precisely this capacity of adaptation that strengthens our model. So, I understand with clearness that to preserve the federal social organizations is, therefore, preserving the capacity of Brazil to innovate, to produce knowledge, to respond to their social challenges. I've been working with people with more than 20 years old, I learned something that I think applies very well to what we are living today. Nothing about us without us. So, we are apt to contribute to this debate. There are 10 social organizations of science and technology that have experience as a result of results. We are talking about evidence. The scientists can't deny evidence. So, I think we have, yes, a condition, we have a protagonist, we have legitimacy to qualify this debate and to come to a world that I believe is possible, to all sides. It's a Brazilian society, especially the Brazilian society, it's a public power, it's a public institution, it's a population. Thank you very much for your attention. Thank you very much.