COMISSÃO DE CONSTITUIÇÃO E JUSTIÇA E DE CIDADANIA

Edge. the opportunity to be here with you I have several questions that were asked, but several questions that were asked at the end. I will have a long time on the introduction and on the other questions. So I will... to pass very quickly by some of them, because we already discussed, we have been talking about recently during this long time. But it was asked about... productivity. You have several studies on proactivity at the disposal You have a Fundação Getúlio Vargas, which made a study, "Agrupamento de Empresas" and analyzed it. There's one of the studies. I take 19 companies and what impact was the impact? As companies have a direct aumento of their receipts after the reduction of the return. So, it increases productivity, improves the conditions. from the gains that have been in satisfaction. The other one was, the deputada Erika, who made reference to the Coringão do Vicentinho, When the Coringa wins, the people are more satisfied with the work, but also happens with the palmeirense, with the Santistas, with the São Paulino, with the Flaminguistas, with the Fluminense, in Bahia, in the South with the Grêmio, with the International, in fact, this is part. the relationship, the reaction of people when they are well with life. When they are well with life, they do everything better. Right. And we can't do it with the good life, but we can't do it with violence against women, which is in Brazil. I said, and the deputy Foss reference to this, which I will try to talk a little bit. Redução de jornada. It diminutes costs operacional and maintains talent in companies. This is very important. that we work with this pose that will be directly on the productivity. And there are other companies that 44% have a significant improvement in the period of operation. In fact, the reduction of the turnover adds a lot of value to companies and not only to people, so it adds a lot of value to the country, to the economy. Our young boss also referred to That, in fact, I wanted to ask... I'll ask you to enter contact with me, then you can send me an archive, it's easier to answer it, than just the questions you sent here. Can you be? And I'll ask you all the questions, I've already discussed this long, before your Excellency, I'll go to the recinto. Can you be? Thank you. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I've been talking about armas in the head of the empresarial. This government doesn't talk about armas, it's about love and peace. solidarity, harmonia, improvement, productivity, We ended up, last week, we did a National Work conference. with the 27 stages of the state. And now, national tripartite. the same number of delegations and delegations of the government, and the government is federal, and municipalities. The same candidate of the employee, the candidate of the employee. It's a harmonious process. Evidently, there were debates... more calorados, less calorados, groups of work, it's part. of a natural process of dialogue, where there are differences. There are differences in the bank of the workers, there are differences in the government, there are differences in the bank of the government, but it conjugated in a resolution, in a declaration of conference, very important. in the end, if everything is right, you will see my article. with the president of one of the Confederations, to publish for this sintonia of governments, workers and employers looking for the environment of work. It's necessary. It's necessary to deal with differences, it's necessary to debate in a way mad, serene, with the ground, with the head in place, to be able to walk. Evidently that there are impacts, I already said here, including in the introduction, but the impact will surely be absorbed by the positive impact of productivity. I believe in this, honestly, speaking here, you are. Fausto, I agree with that we need more education. and not only in schools. I need more education at home. We talk a lot about families, sometimes we need to take responsibility of educating better children and children, and for us to be able to create adults of the future that is better than We here. because this our In this moment, we have a lot of people, for anything, who is beating, who is agred, talking about armament, arm in the head, talking about aggression, talking about death. "Matar a woman because she is corrupt." In fact, it seems to be a woman's proprietor. So it's something that, in fact, needs to work more the emotional and educational state So This government talks about all the segments. I receive there, prefects, prefects, vereadores, vereadores, deputados, senators, in fact, it's my obligation to receive them every one who looks there. And I receive many employees, many even. and I look to interact with them with the event difficulties that they have. whether small or medium, or medium, or large, interacting with the industry industry, with the farm, with the receitas, with various and the other ministries, to be able to collaborate. The President Luton has said the following: "Our obligation is to help." as companies that have any difficulty. We need to seek help. Now, in a debate like this, it is necessary that we look for the gain of productivity, the better conditions of life, and apostate that it is possible. Well, what a miracle? The miracle is the experience of the past. We already work 60 hours per week, we already work 48 hours per week, we are working 44 hours, we are going to 40. And all the steps that were reduced, we compensated the gain of productivity and better conditions of the market. Never had a compensation process. So I believe that this is not necessary. But we will debate? Of course we will debate, there is no problem. We will have the opportunity to debate. We don't increase the tax tax, I want to re-affirm here. There was a increase of one item, a diminution of another item, and individualized items. We increased a little bit. the income of the super-riches. to compensate the expense of the income of the rent to 5.000, this is what we are doing, we are reducing the expense. and with repercussions of 37.350. I believe that this debate about the income in Brazil It's necessary to be a more efficient income. because this reform is necessary that we seek to, in the future, aprofund the Because what we did in the $5.000,00 is a cup of water in the ocean. Because Brazil is still very disqual. If the Brazil is very disqualified, We need to look at what is wrong. You are very diseguado because you have a camada, a casta the Brazilian elite, which has a huge income of income, versus a huge number of millions and millions of families, gaining very little. It's what will end with the Bolsa Família, because if we want to end with Bolsa Família, we have to improve the distribution of income of the country. If we don't improve the capacity of the work, We never will have the condition of talking about the social benefits. So if we want to diminish the benefits of social, we need to aprofund the reform of the rent, so we need to increase the rent of the work. And in this way, the President Lula says, "I see your workers as a consumer.". Surely we will win. So, I want to thank you immensely the participation of all the deputies and deputies, I want to comment, dear President Leur, and dear deputies, our reporter. I would like to thank my team and the retaguard, and above all, I would like to wish that this house, as well as the insurance company has been in the rent, can reach a important place to drive quickly to get to the solution. Why did we not do this? Right at the beginning, I have a question here. Because we had to recover the Brazil, to rebuild the Brazil. It's important to remember that when the President Lula, in fact, the President Lula, He had to interact with the Brazilian parliament, you are here as deputies, you are witnesses that we had to do the PEC of the Transition. because they didn't have money to pay the rest of the resources of $300 billion, just in the electoral process of the government. And we won't repeat the experience of breaking the public resources to buy a election. If you're not in a process electoral, this is not impediment of analyzing with serenity a desire of the mass of the workers' work. It can be impeded. The electoral process. Now, why was that now? Because we were creating conditions, even to create a job and job and job that had been closed, so as many policies. This is the simple reason we didn't have done this debate before. Now, we are partying with the Parliament, because the projects and the PEC are and we have to value the parliamentary initiative. So, to be a part of the parliament, I'm going to invite you to be here with you. We will always be here and there at the ministry, to help us in the study, to share and share. And it's very important to have a technical table that looks at the impact to calm our business. And that's the affirmation that was said here, "I'm afraid of reducing salary", Here is a guarantee. Reduce the journey without a salary. This is the fear that we have. Is that the journey is to reduce the salary? No. The journey is to reduce the salary. Thank you.