COMISSÃO DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA E COMBATE AO CRIME ORGANIZADO

17 mar. 2026 10:10 às 12:38

Sobre o Evento

O evento debateu a ampliação do porte de armas para auditores agropecuários, servidores públicos e cidadãos, defendendo o armamento como ferramenta essencial para a autodefesa, o combate ao crime organizado e a proteção de profissionais em áreas de risco.

Status
Concluído
ID: 81082Total: 47 discursos
#20
Transcrição automática

Big O. Thank you very much. I think our country, unfortunately, when it comes to the security issue, we are administered by a lot of incompetents that is not a good thing for us, because we have many deputies, many people who study security, but we are administrating by incompetent people who don't understand and don't get into people who understand. Because when we don't understand a certain topic, we can find people who understand. like Bolsonaro did in economics, for example, he said he didn't understand the economy, but he found a specialist to help. And unfortunately this happens in our country. And this makes us see aberrations in our country, that even today, for example, we see the private security agents, the vigilantes, and not have the ability to have your arm. It's absurd to imagine, for example, professionals who work armed with no one can have a gun outside of work. There are several situations in Brazil where it needs to be assessed seriously, not responsible. Because no one, no one, I know some deputies here in Brazil, that says that they have to distribute the weapon, throwing the weapon on the pees of people. "Hey, take a gun here, a pistol." Everyone who defends the weapon, defends it with responsibility, with criteria, doing training. It's obvious, it's the basic thing. But if a human human has the ability to wear a weapon if it's done as avaliations and training? He has. I know, for example, in the state of Ceará, it's a polemicization when it's talking about gun weapons, but in the Ceará, for example, I saw a military formation, in three months the police were on the street and that within these three months they had a period of two weeks of training for the pistol They are working. And nobody from the left, who is talking about armament, was there to question about this. We need to work with responsibility. I see, we see here, professionals serious, that work for the country, people who have a training educational vasta e que precisam de uma proteção para poder to perform their own work is a need for the function of risk that this work offer during their performance. I see here, I say this, but we also need to say other situations. I see, for example, in the same situation where the difficulty that you have been in, the justice The Justice Department of Ceará, for them to be able to enter a community There are people who have been running for a run, they have killed officers and until today It's a challenge to understand the obvious What is that there is to understand the government? We have here conversations, productive conversations, the house's security, which is being held by Coronel Meira, I see that in a way, you know, very, very... He's brilliant. He's been doing this leadership of the committee. He brought the Ministry of Justice and Security to talk with us and we have tried to deal with the government to understand the difficulties, because They turned this debate into something of ideology, and it's not to be treated like this. It's to be taken from a technical way. of the way responsible. So if you want to take the politicization and go to the technical debate, we will show the reality. Because they say that if if the power of the citizen would be a maturation. This was not the discussion of the left? If more people have weapons, it's more violence, more death, more this, more that. And the data showed the opposite. the expansion of the use of the gun for the citizen It made it reduce the violence in Brazil, which was exactly the contrary to what the leftist would say. So if we leave this debate ideological, We're going to advance. Now we want to leave the debate ideological, but it also can also be able to leave the government, who has a hand in hand, to leave the government. We can't be in this politicized, this debate raso, about all the issues to see if you win like, win, is a debate serious. Let's go to the technical side. Let's talk about I was a vereador in the state of Ceará. And in 2016... I defend the arm of the guard. Look at the absurd. Look at this country. The prefecture is going to be a professional of security take the money from our imposts, pay for the worker to offer security and leave it disarmated. to the point that no Ceará happened to two armed officers put a car from the municipal guard to run. They were in front of a car Captain Aldi. E They were on the front of the vehicle and showed the pistol. and the team was disarmated because they couldn't have the weapon. A viatura de segurança do município Pago com recursos públicos para dar segurança, teve que dar ré e ir embora. Look at the absurd, we defend the arm of the municipal force, only now in 2026, look at the absurd, since 2016, only now in 2026, the prefecture of Fortaleza has been able to arm the efetive of the municipal force. Then you see how many assaults could have been avoided, how many deaths could have been avoided. So we have to go into this debate seriously, responsibly. We have the social-educated agents that need to be a port of arms, that have exactly the same function of the police. But, here, to the specific topic of the audience, it's to say: "Contem with us." The government needs to see that it's not just a debate ideological, not just a debate of opposition to the situation, it's a debate of survival. and the conditions to execute your work with safety. The State has a duty to give us security. The security is a right, but it is a responsibility of the municipality, the State and the State of the Union. But the police is not on the present. The police is not on the present. We have some situations, for example, in the interior of the city of Ceará, where, in the interior of the city, if you're acting a police, the police will come in 40 minutes. Then the citizen will be a refém of this state? that to offer security you have to wait 40 minutes to get it? It's an absurd, it's a thing without a sense, that there is no scientific calculation, that there is only a cheap, cheap, cheap, cheap, and without worrying about it. as people on the phone. Contem with us to fight for this, to make a debate serious. I'm sorry to be a deputy captain Walden, who is a guy who has a huge respect, you know, It's a guy who really milita on the security side, who defends this cause. And I'm sure that if we're going to join... I feel like people are not aware of the way we want. not the way we want, but we can see that there is a conscientization of the population in Brazil, even by the information, by the information that we can receive on social media, and I believe that we are caminhando pra sabe pra mudar to come another government with a different line, because the current government doesn't want to hear. The current government doesn't want to hear Because if he wanted to hear it, it's not the voice of Noel... It's not the voice of Alberto Fraga, it's the voice of Farruh, it's the voice of Alden, it's the voice of the people. the people are full of shit, the people are tired of talking fixtures You know, there's a lot of projects, we're defending women, a lot of projects that at the end is nothing with nothing, a lot. And women still live because they're not listening to the people. The people who are pained for the people who have the right to defend themselves, the people who are serious, they are tired. Because in Brazil, unfortunately, what is happening in reality is... - Super protection for those who choose not to pay. and the government is working on who wants to pay. Basically, the Brazil is today. If you are a victim, you have a series of benefits, a series of rights. There are a lot of institutions defending them, defending them, defending them, defending them, defending them, defending them, defending them. They have to have a intimate visit, they have to have a custodian, they have to have remission, they have to have this, they have to have that. And the worker and the citizen are forgotten, are left to side. It's another victim. So, come with us to defend as conditions for that you can work. It's what I want to leave here, registrar for all of you. Thank you, President. Valiu.

17 de mar, 11:31