COMISSÃO DE MINAS E ENERGIA

- so to establish the exclusive right of the land owner to solicit authorization of research and concessions for mineral waste which will be commercialized in the form of the regulation. The proposal also aims to revoke legal dispositions that currently guarantee the separation between the property of the soil and the resources of minerals. author of the PL 4571/2024 justifies the proposal with the argument that the rural proprietors are directly affected by the environmental, social and economic impacts of the farming in their lands, but they do not control their authorization and are not adequately compensated. According to him, when he has given the proprietor the exclusive right to require research and law, The measure would be adequate compensation for the damages and disorders brought by the minering activities. the project I didn't have a pencil. The project was distributed to the Minas and Energia Commission, the Constitution and Justice The appreciation of the proposal is concluded the Commission's regime of the ordinarily and ordinarily, according to the 24th, 162 and 151 the Article 6 of the Committee, both requirements of the Intervention of the Câmara of the Dept. In this committee, in the end of the legislative process, the amendment will not be presented. It is the report. The mineral sector represents one of the most important pillars in the Brazilian economy and it is essential to the economic sector for the development of the country. With a rich diversity of resources, Brazil is positioned among the world's biggest minerals in minerals, like ferro, gold, niobium and bauxita. Historically, the mineration was a ramp for the occupation and development territorial since the colonial period. Moreover, the mineral sector is a significant source of employment and materials-primers, fundamental for strategic industries such as siderurgia, fertilizers, petrochemical and metallurgy. The Federal Constitution of 1988 is clear to establish that the minerals minerals, including the subsolo, are the United States. Article 176. Detalhe que as jazidas em lava ou não e demais recursos minerais constituem propriedade distinta do solo para efeito de exploração ou aproveitamento e pertence à União. The research and the larvae of these minerals minerals can only be performed by the Unions or concession no interesse national for Brazilian companies or businesses under the Brazilian laws and that have their sede and administration in the country. In this context, the Unions, through the National Minerals, has the right to be sovereign and control over the minerals of minerals. Although the mineral resources belong to the UN, The property of the soil, also called superficiaries, already has rights established in our legal system. He is not owner of the subsolo and, therefore, has no property of the minerals there exist. Contudo, The Federal Constitution assegura the property of the soil the participation of the results of the LAVRA. Additionally, the miner miner is responsible for sacrificing the superficie from the soil. which includes the payment of indenization by damages and damages caused materials and morals. and a rent by occupying the land to be investigated or laid. Only in the mineral license for substance use in immediate employment in the civil civil law, the law requires that the requerent owner of the property of the immobile or have its own express authority. to establish that the exclusive right of the land of the land to solicit authorization of research and concessions for the waste of minério affect the atrial capital to the competitive sector and competitive Brazil, currently any agent regardless of being a proprietor, can require the livres, which stimulates concorrent. to restrict this right to the proprietors, the competition will be eliminated between the various interests, with a limit of the market to a very much lower number of 2014, which would be a economic and technological innovation, brought by players more experienced and capitalized. In addition, many of the jurors not have the technical, financial or financial capacity necessary to do research in LAVRA. activities that require investment and technical knowledge. This existence, as well as property of the land, could lead to the subutilization of the ociosity of the jazidas and prevent the rational use of the mineral resources in the national interest. The country would just be able to explore its full potential mineral, strategic mineral, even for minerals critical to energy transition. This, by the way, comprometeria a tração de investimentos e, consequentemente, a geração de empregos, renda e royalties. Additionally, the proposal of exclusivity of the mineral rights to the property of the land, would stimulate the fundraisal. Proprietários of land-on-areas with mineral potential could have a right to explore just to keep the value of the property. without any interest or capacity in the mineração. This would favor the purchase of land with mineral potential as meros finance financeiros, consequently, travations of the development of the sector. in this scenario The use of the use of the use of the proposed proposed, would lead to a significant loss of the public. financial compensation for mineral exploration, CEFEM, and the imposter that can contribute to the Union. the state and municipalities would be compromised due to the reduction of the formal activity of the production. municipalities economically dependents of the minering, could suffer economic acceleration, loss of jobs and unemployment, and the unemployment rate, "With efeito, I attribute to the sole proprietor the sole right exclusively to require research in mineral water, would have graves advantages to the Brazil, like a lower efficiency economic and technological, reduction of investments and public arrecada. Aumente da concentração fundiária e especulação imobiliária. Before exposto, the deputy Evair Vieira voted for the resolution of the PL 4571, 2024. Thank you very much.