COMISSÃO DO ESPORTE

- Thank you. and I think the deputy got to I want to present here a expression that reveals a lot the intent of this audience, which is the question of the caution, right, deputado? Especially when we talk about a very expensive issue, which is the principle of autonomy. and also the sport organizations. So, in this sense, we came here with with a tranquility, even with the disposition of the debate with the to the guests, to the interested public, bring the position the reports that were emit in the field of the Ministry of Sport, through their secretaries, And we have here... I want to reveal to you that the secretaries emit a contrary to the proposition although we recognize the importance the proposal brought by the nobre parlamentar. It's a legitimate concern, right? It's a legitimate concern of the organizations, there is to recognize this this is the merit of the proposal. However, the understanding that we have is that The law of sports already ensures mechanisms of protection The right arcabouço jurídico existente, he already segura indenização pela formação, mechanism of compensation along the career and criteria rigorosos for the recognition of the entidades formadoras. Or, or, the current system already protects the investment in the base, in a structured way and equilibrary. We see this in the same article 99, paragraph 5, he brings the mechanism of protection. Inclusive, this model is linked to the best practices internationally. In the field of FIFA, for example, there are already consolidating mechanisms, like training compensation, solidarity mechanisms, that guarantee the remuneration of the formative entities, without restringing the freedom of the athlete, especially in the beginning of their professional career. Thank you. The project and we discussed, to prever a indemnization even without a contract firm, he rompe with this logic. And it can generate, as a direct freedom of the young athlete, just in the moment more sensitive to your training. The technical literature, including, reforça this concern. Studies like Greco and Benda, which were made in 1998, demonstrate that between the 14 and 16 years, which is the direction of the direction, The athlete defines his career sport. In this context, we understand that it would be reasonable to a entity of modality that is not reasonable, but rather than saying that a entity of a modality receives a indenization when the athlete opts for migrating to another sport, like for example, from a modality X to dedicate to football. This would create a negative effect on the sport's mobility, interfering in a process that should be free and oriented by the best interest of the athlete. In addition, the proposal amplifies this logic to different types of different ways. which is revealed as necessary and even distorsive, since the current legislation offers instruments suficient, and each model has own own dynamics of formation, which need to be respected. There is also the risk of accentuation of inequalities in the sport system, especially especially in smaller entities and less structured and less. So, the National Football Secretariat in their opinion, it understands that the legislation already exists to prevent these mechanisms necessary to protect the autonomy of the sport, the autonomy of the athlete, So, the way the most adequate way would be the aprofundment about the criteria, to have more clarity about the criteria. The strengthening of the compensation along the career and the incentive directly to the entidades of the form. So, in this sense, the Ministry position, the Secretaries positional, and they were contrary to these proposals. So, I'm reiterating here your disposal to contribute with solutions that preserve balance. between the value of training, the freedom of the athlete and the justice system sport. That's what we have to manifest. I thank you. E I'm at the disposal. No, no.