COMISSÃO DE DEFESA DOS DIREITOS DAS PESSOAS COM DEFICIÊNCIA

28 abr. 2026 15:00 às 16:27

Sobre o Evento

A Comissão de Defesa dos Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência debateu o capacitismo e as falhas nas avaliações biopsicossociais em concursos públicos. O foco principal foi a exclusão indevida de candidatos com deficiência, incluindo autistas, em certames da segurança pública, como o do Corpo de Bombeiros do DF.

Status
Concluído
ID: 81675Total: 72 discursos
#24
Presidente - PSB/DF Rodrigo Dias
Rodrigo Dias

Presidente - PSB/DF

Transcrição automática

- Okay. Hello? You are listening? Good afternoon everyone. First, I'll briefly give my own self-scription. I'm a white man. with the castanho-clar, slightly I'm a little bit of this abut of politics. I'm wearing a blue shirt, jeans, jeans. First, I want to thank our deputado federal, Rodrigo Hollenberg, who has been a great defender of people with disabilities here in the Federal District. I think it's important to say, governor, and always our governor, the fundamental work that the president has developed in the front of the Federal District for people with disabilities. for people with disabilities here in the Federal District. The first forum of inclusion of people with disabilities, also with the Ministry of Public Health, because we already had, we already had this challenge of employment. In fact, many other causes, as the first central of Libras and other causes that we managed to advance along with our government in front of the District of the District. I want to thank the member of Carolina, the Council of National People with Disciences, the great friend Marcos. Casa Grande, junto com a UAM, que tem sido esses guerreiros aí nessa batalha por justiça. Eu acho que o que a gente está falando aqui, deputado, e a todos os membros dessa comissão, eu acho que é muito importante a gente ter esse momento aqui agora, para a gente... to make public what is happening in a public concurso in the capital of our country. What we are seeing is a process extremely discricionary. There is no other word to define this. A committee biopsicossocial extremely discricionary in the selection of those who were apt and those who were not apt, as well as Sometimes a person with the same deficiency, with the same laudo, was considered apta, and another person was considered inapta. We're talking about a process that was discricionary and structural. We're talking about data from more than 80% of the candidates with deficiencies were considered inaptes, Unfortunately, what we see is that, unfortunately, those who seem to pass, had their own political partners linked to the government of the DF. That's why we, from the PSB, entered with this mandate of security. That's why we have been able to do this. I think that we have been able to do this. I think that the advance of the Defender was important in relation to permit that the candidates do TAF. that the committee didn't have any specialists, because the committee came to take a few minutes, these candidates still need to pass by this process of justice. federal. Então, obrigado, deputado, parabéns pelo trabalho e parabéns a todos e todas que estão nessa luta e contem com a gente. Só uma colocação, não é

28 de abr, 14:24