Clovis Squio

Presidente, só agradecer a oportunidade de dizer... do mérito da proposta, ela nos aponta para um um futuro promissor, que gera desenvolvimento, que gera mais riqueza para que essa riqueza possa ser distribuída. Essa é a tônica. Acabei não citando alguns exemplos, instrumentos que a gente gostaria de fazer lá em Santa Catarina, por exemplo, fundo garantidor de crédito, a gente tem projeto, mas não tem o dinheiro. e esse dinheiro desses fundos eles servem pra isso em especial então ele barateia o crédito pro pro produtor ele possibilita que ele acesse outras linhas de crédito então é um uma ferramenta seria fundamental pra Não? a base é o imposto de renda, que é dividido em fp é fpm e os fundos esses de desenvolvimento regionais acredito que se o sul e sudeste puder ter a condição de 1% cada região do dessa base fpm O imposto de renda recolhido seria muito maior porque... renda e emprego gerado que de fato vai abastecer num círculo virtuoso. Então, é isso, agradecer, parabenizar pela iniciativa e ficar à disposição. Muito obrigado.

Thank you. . Mr. President, Mr. Valdir Kobabukhin, nobre and conterrâneo. Mr. Relator, Deputy Arnaldo Jardim, and other parliamentarians, colleagues, good afternoon to all and to all. Eh... With a great honor, I come in the name of our governor, Jorginho Mello, our vice-governor, Mary-Lise Boing. our Secretary of the Fazenda, Cleverson Sievert, to bring a single contribution to this debate of importance Eh... - The regional fund, these regional fund constitucionals we will highlight that are of the repartition of the Unions and that will to the business activity, the product sector. We are not talking about of the Union's repasses to that the administration public with expenses, even if it were investments or expenses of costeio. Our pauta, as fundos regional funds, is the availability of resources to move and aquecer the economy These are the finalities of the regional fund different from the other constitutional fund, mentioned by our nobre President. the participation of the states and the participation of the municipalities. So uh... I say we have total adherence with the spirit of the Constitution to promote uh... the reduction of regional inequalities It's very noble, very just. this principle of our Magna Carta, and therefore we are defenders of them. Now, We need to, yes, evaluate the public policies, and these funds that we have been mentioned, Mr. President, are instruments of public policies, the regional development fund, of the development of regional development, of the product, of the supply of capital, so that the production, the production, to bring development which is the current, then, of our current economic system. by the way of production, of work, and thus generating riqueza, so that it can be shared. The riqueza needs to be created to then share. So, we are defensors of the reduction of inequalities regionally. The article that is in the Constitution, 159, he talks about these instruments, so, of funds. It's money for the public administration to make their policies. The funds that are here in debate are for the product sector. I have other differences. If we look at the repartition of the Unions with states, municipalities and regions for the end of the regional inequality, we see that there is a distribution quite privileged or, or, right, for the states of North, North and Central and West. If we take, for example, and I speak here as responsible for the financial operations, the Secretariat, the Tesoro, in the Secretariat of the Fazenda, of a state, of Santa Catarina. So, forgive me, but my bias will always be looking at the... the view of the state So I'll be mainly at the FPE, for example, let's see. take this same division which the regional fund brought in five regions, In fact, three that are and the two that we are discussing in this PEC, we are looking to contemplate. If we take, for example, the data from 2025, last year, for the the FPE is very much done to reduce inequality. It means that the more the population of a certain state, minus the state receive from the FPE. So what was distributed last year by the União, apart from the Fundeb, which is another FUNDEB talk. The FUNDEB talk was, last year, 164 million, billions of reunions, for the states by the UFPF. Then we'll see how much was for the South and the Sudest. I can list the values. Santa Catarina was the penultimate state The penultimate to receive, but not less than São Paulo, is 2,2 billion. 2,2 billion. Thank you. uh... This, for Santa Catarina, is less than 10% of your payment. So, to put it in perspective, what represents So, 2,2 billion to Santa Catarina, Paraná 4,6 billion, Rio Grande do Sul 3,5 billion. So, it means that the South region of 164 billion distributed was with 10,3 billion. about 6,4% of all the FPEs. 6,4% for the USA. If we take the South-West, For more than 14 billion I which represents 14,8 billion percent, which means What do we have? 10% for the region, 14% for the region of the Sudeste, and the FPE, which is the main instrument the distribution, distributed to the South and South, 24 billion. It's a number even smaller do que os valores Eh... Well, first... This gives 15%. about 15% do do do do do fp fundo participação dos estados então 85% dos 164 bilhões foram destinados aos estados que possuem the regional fund North, North and Central-Oeste. So, there is a distribution visando a redução de desigualdades por meio do FPE, de forma que 85% dos recursos vão para esses estados, and 15% for the US and the US. So, there is still... the regional fund. which is for the fund North, North and Central-Oest, last year it was something like 27 billion, or The regional fund repassar para as regiões atendidas more than the regions of the South and the Sudetenland received in FPF. Okay, we are very defensors of the reduction of inequalities, but it seems that the public policies have to be reviewed. And probably in this review, maybe, and this is the point I would like to bring, by the increase of the availability of resources for the South and South-est, to be able to improve their logistics, so that the production can be removed. to be able to work in production, to be able to work in production, In fact, can have better conditions of life in the South and South, probably the cake those resources to be divided, as I didn't say, but the FPE, the FPM, the funds here in debate, they are associated with the income of rent and the industrial products of the Union, we hope that with the highest investment in the South and South, there is a greater economic development and so the Union will recover more. and about 50% or close to 40% if it's increased, the percentual to be used to the South and South-Est, 40% that will remain for the Unions, they will also increase. So it's a little bit smaller, but in a larger base, because it's propiciering conditions for the product sector ... to make the economic development, which is your life. So, our defense is, yes, we have to distribute, but it can't be so So, they are distributed in a way that 85% of the FPS are in North, North, Central and West. only 15% of the FPE is in the South and South. And these 15% are, in terms of financial, less than the other funds that other regions have and the Suds and Suds have not. Another point I would like to add to the debate is the fact that this resource he comes from the form of the Unions, he simplifies a lot. "The conditions of the financing to be offered to the local sector. I'll give an example. Santa Catarina has a program called here also the PRONAMP, where the state pays, the pay, subsidize the operations of the employees that take care for investing to be able to get jobs and rent the principal of this operation. the employer takes the empréstimo, pays the principal, and the state pays the juros. So, in Santa Catarina, for example, I will go down to the bottom. of 100 million that we paid of the tax. The employees raised $600 million. So they got $600 million, they will return $600 million, and this would generate $100 million of juros, which is the state that pays. but it is expensive and it is a small proportion of 1 to 6 Because banks, notably Badesc, which is a Fomento de Santa Catarina, and BRDE, which is regional, the region of the South, need to seek money in the market. And today no one can do it. with the Selic at 15%. Eh... and to borrow a lower tax than $1,000. 18% per year Why? Because the money is not from him. The money came from the regional fund. while the funds regionally money is free and so banks, agencies of support, can practice taxas mais módicas making money at more people and generate more jobs and more employment and more economic growth. I'll cite an example of a program that the governor Jorginho launched in Santa Catarina, called "Strada Boa Rural". He made a good road, while the road. But the problem of production in Santa Catarina is affecting the rural areas. How will the leite come to the laticinium, the meat, the food, the food, It was a program abolished in which the state would enter with half of the resources, the other half would be in the interest of the other half would be in the interest of these agencies that I have said. Badesk and BRDE. as agencies would be able to pay 18% I'm going to tell you. Why? Because it was necessary to capitalize. Thank you. in a effort the state of the Poder So, the funding was offered, the money that banks will pay for the municipalities. in the form of a capital. So we are increasing capital of the agencies, they don't need to capture these resources in the market, so that the rate of 18% per year which would be the market standard for these operations, are being made with IPCA +4%. IPCA last year gave 4,26%, plus 4%, 8,26%. is less than half of the encarges that the market offers. So, it facilitates that the company, the producer, can, in fact, to take the resources, apply it on your production and have the possibility of devolving. and generate production, income, income and income. So, I'm going to go ahead and be able to the final, I'm going to be at the table and I'm very grateful for the invitation, the idea that we want to pass is: if the redistribution is just and necessary, Agora, There should be a point of balance. If we can further further economic activity, where the resources are left, that they have these funds It will not be a scenario of a disaster. It will not be a division for everyone to be with less. The result, especially in a fund that will strengthen the financing in the product sector, will be more jobs, more rent, more income, more IPI, and so all the states, the municipalities and regions will be able to have more resources to redistribute, and the part that will be for the Unions will be greater. This is our expectation, our contribution to the debate.