PLENÁRIO

2 a 3 mar. 2026 18:18 às 00:36

Sobre o Evento

O evento debateu temas centrais como a transparência governamental, o fim de sigilos, a criminalização do desaparecimento forçado e políticas de financiamento à exportação via BNDES. Houve intensas divergências sobre a instalação de farmácias em supermercados, regulamentação de rotulagem de alimentos vegetais e o auxílio aos produtores rurais gaúchos. A sessão foi marcada por embates ideológicos, discussões sobre a Lei da Anistia e a condução de votações nominais, refletindo a polarização política e as prioridades do Legislativo.

Status
Concluído
ID: 81154Total: 352 discursos
#86
Transcrição automática

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, President. I will show you this table to show some concerns that we have in relation to this project. In our view, this project is very preocupant. because The declaration is beautiful, "Fortalecer Exportation". but this goes in the contrary once the State puts the guarantee and the power of the pen above all. So I'll elencar some things. First because socializes private and in sectors that are chosen by the government. The reason for much concern is that not only aviation was chosen, but also the question of the We want to build a hydroelectric engine in the border with Bolivia. We have to do Itaipu II mission. Itaipu, a national bill that nobody knows, nobody knows, that nobody knows, that has billions and billions of people being released. No one is not a risk. Paraguay, we pay a lot of Paraguay? There is our other country, Itaipu. We also pay much more than him, and he uses much more than us, and everyone thinks this beautiful. And nobody will be able to take it. billion were removed to build what the government wants in a caixa 2 bárbaro, and there's no explanation. They want to do the same thing here, building in Bolivia. So we are increasing a huge credit. to build a binational unit or to give permission to it. And if the company doesn't pay or something happens, it falls on the collar of the contribuint. of the Brazilian citizens. And let's remember that the most poor pay the cost. Just see that Itaipu was for a lot of money, and here is much more barat. And the most poor still is the most expensive. Why? Because they still there They're taking this money to do what? What they want. Publicity, building a diversification, do what you want. So, the governance... And another thing that is sad is that isentando the public service is being a risk for Brazil because the agents will take more risk because there is a national response. Let's read the article 5th, guys. "The public public's involved in the decision in action of the official support of the credit only will be responsible for their technical decisions and opinions in case of a loss. or gross error, And then they say: "The executive executive will regulate the responsibility of the public agents of the public's care, including the definition of the public's care." of gross dollar gross Thank you, President. I'll just finish. Are you doing what here? Are you justifying that they're going to do wrong, that they're going to endoss and a bad intention? So, with all respect here to the President Arlindo Schnaglia. I really am very concerned about this project. It is a clear authority to something that the future will say. But there are strong indices that there are things wrong here, so we are against it. Thank you very much, Deputy Adriana Ventura. I would like to say, Deputy Pastor Henrique Vieira.

02 de mar, 19:43