COMISSÃO DE CONSTITUIÇÃO E JUSTIÇA E DE CIDADANIA
Sobre o Evento
A audiência pública na CCJC debateu o fim da escala 6x1 e a redução da jornada de trabalho. Representantes sindicais e parlamentares defenderam a mudança como medida essencial para a saúde, dignidade e produtividade dos trabalhadores, rechaçando cortes salariais e destacando a importância da negociação coletiva para garantir o reequilíbrio social e a qualidade de vida.
Presidente - Central dos Sindicatos Brasileiros - CSB
There's no. Yeah. The reporter said some questions very interesting. that and put in the Constitution to determine that these are two days of rest. If I understand it, it was this the question. - Thank you. A propósito do Ministro. - Thank you. I would be here This would be ideal. but I'm a defender of the collective negotiations. Every time more, should be empowered the sindicatos to exercise A collective negotiation. The main thing is to decide the limit of the journey. Definido o livre de jornada, transfere a responsabilidade para os sindicatos de trabalhadores e patronais para a sua realidade. and above it to be able to get the information. effectively. So we can alter it as it is in the article, instead of saying 44 hours, reduce it to 40 hours a day. When the senhor says that the number of people is 3... Step up. like always. This was a premise that was put on the report. Regra de Transição. that were also put in place. We've been working with the rule of transition. But, 38 years later, only if it was to advance to reduce in the 40% to 36% really, not the fact? - Hey, Reginaldo, because, deputado, I've been a year since I've been a LTI. If you think about what was technology and information advanced, and what generated for companies The productivity, the productivity, which was appropriated by the patron and never distributed by the workers, is the effective time of you to do it. So, in our opinion. Obviously we will curve here the decision from the Senate, from the Senate, from this Congress. But for us it would be a reduction to 40 hours immediately. Aumento de produtividade. Increase cost versus increase cost. The costs today are... very heavy for companies, and they don't understand. They come with costs numeric, with planilations. They forget the burnout. For example, we will try to make this month of May, a NR1. who is working on mental health. Look at the number of people who are going to burnout, with mental health problems, or accident of work, because excess of hours of hours, and because the average salary is low, and they need to do hours extra, but more hours excessively. is a mistake, burnout is a mistake. It's a work. It's a cost for a thing. This is what happens, even with the 8, the study of the proficient. There are studies, yes. I'm going to be along with negative impacts, studies made by IPEA, by DIESE, by CESIT, which were able to do the centrais sindicals, in the sense that it is not real, these numbers, that is the system patronal put in this discussion. In fact, it is good to say that all the research costs are paid with our money, including our system. Deb? Repercussão do micro e pequeno em empreendedores. Creio que não vai haver essa repercussão. Eu acho que é muito mais fácil trabalhar com pequeno even because he already has to the tax tax tax difference for him, relator. It already works in a different way. It's simple, simple national. Now we're discussing here, we're going to increase the simple to 100.000, create the MEI, create a series of things. I believe that, normally, the conversation with the small is much simpler. We've had problems with the big companies, the big corporations. They come here and don't want to do it even with us. I will give you a report that is a report that I always do. The IBM, you can see the IBM as a technology information? It's been a trade for not to follow the collective convention of the technology and information, which has a journal of 40 hours. And there in the trade, unfortunately, it continues with 44%. - Regra de Transition: "How to avoid the loss of fixed and variable salary?" This is a interesting discussion, which could be regulated by a collective convention. But I will give an example of my category. It's good to always work with the own experience. In the 1990s, we regulated the issue of digitization. We禁止 "Productivity for digitizer". The dictator made 12.000 20.000 TOCs per hour. Do you know what it is? a excellent person I had a datilography of my time, I made 720 toques per minute and 7200 toques per hour. 12.000, 18.000 were a factory of lesionados. It was a factory of tendinite, tenosinovite, all those things were a factory of lesionados. we put maximum limits of 8.000 TOCs. We were surrounded by perfuradores, digitadores, who said: "I'm gaining by productivity, but I forgot your health." So in the future they were able to see that we were taking care of the most important amount of life. Because there was a point that we had a disease, we had a fever, we had a hand, we had a cup of water on our hands. We had no need for a car to take a car, we had no need for a car to carry a car, we had no need for a child to give a leite to him. because of the problem of the Tenosinovich, because of the problem, even, quite difficult. I think that here is also a question for us to discuss effectively in the conveniences of collective agreements. I hope you contribute. Prelator. Thank you. Thank you.




