COMISSÃO DE FINANÇAS E TRIBUTAÇÃO

Thank you. Thank you, President Merlon. Look, I answer the questions of the Deputy Kim with very calmness. Maybe the name is not a grade, but I have participated, and here nobody is criminalizing the amendment, what we criminalize is lack of transparency, just this. The question of the deputy to indicate, regardless of the position of whether or not the amendment is, to fight for them, everything is right. Transparenting, not. We are talking about transparency in origin. So, deputado Kim, in a very clear way, I always was very critical at the lack of transparency in the first of the remarks, initially the remarks of the remarks, after the remarks of the remarks, continue being, and it's been a little bit more. a little after the laws, but still there is a lot of transparency that is missing. So, respond to your question, I don't indiquei emendas from the old budget, when it was RP9, I don't indiquei emendas from RP8, which are emendas of commission, I'm in a commission, including, that has 4,5 billion, I'm in a commission of health, and every time that is voted a toque of caixa, we see that there is a parlamentar that indica 10, the parliamentary that indicates 20, the parliamentary that indicates 2, the parliamentary that indicates 3 million, and I keep thinking, what is the criteria? Is this related to any public policy? Who decided that the parliamentary A, in that city B, who said it should be indicated there and not other cities, because this decision is of the party leadership. Everyone knows that, that's very clear, that's why I always register my vote for it. because I never understood and never clear these criteria. They are political criteria, criteria based on agreements that are made. Even the walls know about this, so I think we have to clear this. This has nothing to do with criminalization. Parliamentaries very serious make the right transparency, take the right decisions and everything is right. but the complaint of the Deputy Kim is valid, since the budget is not transparent. Another thing that I want to make clear private funds, unfortunately the current government operates by private funds, even I'm saying that they are the Caixa 2 funds, It's not a control of the budget, it's not a transparency, it's used as it wants, it's not a fiscalization, and programs are molded in this format. I am author, I was also a author, I entered with a request of auditoria from the PEDMEA, the Tribunal de Contestão União. This is a action. I was there, I entered with a request of auditoria. For those who were interested, it was a request of 101/2025. I entered with several presentations at the TCU. with regards to these parallel budgets. Everything that comes out of the cash, that comes out of the transparency, we have a parallel budget, the VULG, the 2nd, it is not taxable. So I think we have to be more objective to talk about things like they are. The issue of budget and lack of transparency is what makes a city There are studies that show to send a small city, one has a per capita of 10.000,00, per resident, and another neighbor with the same IDH has zero destination and resources. This is not right, this is not a political political, this is not a criteria. It has to be always linked to a technical criteria, because otherwise it's a bad use of public money. In relation, I was even looking at the recent approval that was made from the Seguro Defesa there in the Congress, shows that the question of the fiscalization was said. It was clear, including, that there are 300 million in Brazil, according to the IBGE, 2 million receive security. And Brasília, which is where there are more beneficiaries, there is something wrong. Now, how many voted against it? all these private funds in various projects. How many voted against it? I voted against all of them, I have a certainty. I'm sure I vote against the project that was approved last week, the security defense. So we have to talk about action, we have to talk about what we did. In relation to the Teto, I abate the Teto, I abate the Teto Constitutional to be completed. When I'm at the TCO, I will do the Teto. In relation to the Florentino, I agree. We have many people doing the same thing, and the essential, many times, is not done. And Rodrigo Dazaele has a revolt which is very legitimate. The issue of everyone entering, many times, in a court... Thank you. I will conclude, President, that they are not good for democracy. I signed all the CPMI's and was active in the NSS. I'm waiting for the president of the House to install the Master. Thank you, President. - Thank you. Thank you, Deputy Deputy Adriana Ventura.