CONSELHO DE ÉTICA E DECORO PARLAMENTAR

- Today. Mr. President, Mr. President, Mr. President, Mr. President, the population that is watching us. - Thank you. This process, Mr. President, is important to be clear that started This process was initiated, Mr. President, because of the interference of the Supreme Court in this power. Todos sabem que o Poder Legislativo foi fechado pelo STF. He is closed by the STF. And I will tell you here some points. Thank you. This Congress The approval of the resolution of the Folha. President Lula, Mr. Descondenado, he has the right to vote or not. in our constitution. He voted He came to the National Congress. The Congress, by the way, has the right, with the Constitution, of the slurs or not And the Congress opted for the Delbal Veto. or The majority in the Senate, with 57 votes. And the majority in the Senate, with 41 votes. What happened later on this? the people of Lula He was going to be in the political campaign of 2022, when he was in the political debates, to make it wrong the Brazilian people, unfortunately. But in October he will not be wrong. because the people of the world know who is Lula There are social media that he wanted to censure, there are channels of communication that are showing the truth of the Lula's government in all the requisitions. Nothing advanced in Brazil. except for famine, famine and misery. This is the truth. Inclusive, he put a militant-esquerdista to be in front of the IBGE, to literally make the data. Inclusive, the government doesn't even use it, dep. Zé and dep. Farhou. the data from the official IBGE because they know that it's a lie. The Brazilian people know that it's a lie. It's a shame that they did with IBGE. Inclusive, it's not the deputy leader of the oposição who is talking about it. It's the same servidores who are conquistados. Do IBGE! that made a card informing that the representative of the IBGE, the commander of the IBGE, put a finger on the condenado Lula, fraud and maquia the data. These are facts. Fatos, not narrativas. Then, Mr. President, what happened? this is a lawyer with a penitian All the Congress National This is a fact. Let's go to another fact. This Congress approved, for more than 300 votes, or, the CORO was superior to the change of PEC. or change the federal government through a PEC that the delegado of the Romagen the process would be suspended. with our federal constitution. And in this constitution, it doesn't give more power to make the decision of the National Congress. No other day, to destroy the National Congress, the first-year-old, the first-year-old, the STF, didn't have a vote. the decision of the National Congress and continue the process against the deputado Ramage. Was this or not what happened? Ato contínuo. No president of the republic There, until today, a indult being denied Because, based on the article 84, our Carta Magna, is prerogative of the President of the Republic. Even being the senhor's condemnation, even being the senhora Dilma Rousseff, who was impeachable, in a legal way, based on the federal law and the impeachment of 10.079, 1951, that the government Lula said that was a golpe. Like that lady from Rio Grande do Norte. "Gopi! Foi Gopi!" When you lose it, it's like. What happened, gentlemen? Even the plenary the plenary It was to make a decision of Congress. First, the president, this is a big attack on democracy, so big that the President doesn't know. - Thank you. However, the article 84 was respected by Mr. Michel Temer The STF didn't get it. The Sra. Dilma Rousseff, the STF didn't get it. The Sra. Fernando Henrique Cardoso... Fé Cardoso, the STF didn't get it. The Ms. Dilma, the Mr. Lula, when he came to the president of Bolsonaro, he used the article 84 of our Carta Magna. What did the Supreme Court do? He was going to get the president of the Republic. I ask the gentlemen, where is it written in the article 102, which are the prerogative of the Supreme Court of our country, to be able to do that, that they could do this article. Does the Constitution have a right to do STF to rasg the Constitution? If it's like this, we're not going to be here for who? Act continue, Mr. President. There were several decisions from the National Congress are approved by the majority of the majority. As always, those who have not been a political representation enough here at the National Congress with a action in the Supreme Court. And this, by the way, is from whom? the majority of Congress or the minority of Congress? the minority Look at this, judicialism of equalization. without having a prerogative, and they were judged by people without being privileged. What am I saying? I'm not sure, President. It's the Brazilian legislation. Ora. How can this happen? They were in a legal way, in a constitutional way. They killed people in the chains. The state of the Brazilian tortured people, who is Felipe Martins, who is the senhor Clezão. The state of the Brazilian is with hands of blood, in plena vigência of the Constitution of 1988, which is called the Constitution of the Cidadania. If I'm wrong, I'll correct them. One person was killed by the Brazilian state because it was not placed to be treated by your health. was killed in the mass mass of the dictatorship of Toga. This is a fault I have been talking about it since I was a deputy of the state of the Paraíba, the advance of the Supreme Court. And today, the media that has passed the way, reiterated by the actions arbitrarily of the Supreme Court, recognizes that I'm doing all this stuff to justify the act that the opposition made. So it's very grave the situation that Brazil is facing. We have the superpowers of the Republic, who command Brazil with a gun of fer, through their own刀, legal, constitutional and immoral, who say false, on January 8th. that's false, the day of 8th of January. Where are the images? Who's not even seen the images? Who wanted to do a golpe was Bolsonaro? Where are the images? That's why I've seen the images. a depredação do patrimônio público, e não teve a individualização da conduta para julgar de forma correta essas pessoas. Because of this, Mr. President, we did the occupation in the chair of the chair, as it happened in the Senate, that nothing happened, as it happened in the government, when it was not the government, it already did for several times. Who would like to say the government of Michel Temer, who would like to say the government of Fernando Henrique Cardoso, who would have been to Marmita, who would like to say the president of Bolsonaro. They are false, they are not in history. They are not in the way they want to apagate history. We made a democratic occupation for... If you can help, Socorro ao Congresso Nacional para que todos se unissem. in our Constitution. Because it's very beautiful. In February of the next year, the new legislature will take the possession the deputy, the deputy chief, and all will raise hands and say, I promise to defend the Constitution. Where is the defense of the Constitution? The STF is rasgando the Constitution in a way veement. At the continuous basis, Mr. President, at the base of the government Lula, Observando a rejeição histórica da Suprema Corte, com a pior composição da história do Supremo Tribunal Federal, e aqui eu quero deixar claro... We are not going to do any type of attack to the STF, because if not, they will get our speech to say that we are attacking the institutions. criticizing The way to act as a repio of the law. And now, Mr. President, based on these researches, where almost 80% of the Brazilian population doesn't believe in the Supreme Court. Look at that gravitate, Mr. Mosek. Mr. Promotor Mosek, with all respect to V. Exª. 80% of the Brazilian people They don't believe in the STF. I'm not saying it's the people who are not saying it's the Brazilian people. And they don't have two digits of the Brazilian population. Or, even the government is defending the STF+. I would like to ask the President of the government, of course, to speak public, to speak of impeachment of the minister. Who is the leader of the government? The last week he said in alto and bom tone, we can think about impeachment of ministers. The other said, we need to do a reform of the judiciary. And many people who are involved with the government Lula are defending this publicly. Why are they doing this? Because they are observating the intention of rejection of the Supreme Court. They are using the argument that we always used, that we always used to be talking and sustentating for a long time. And, thank God, The great Brazilian press is, and I'm not going to generalize it, because nothing can be generalized in this country. We have to have responsibility. Just one more 30 seconds, Mr. President, to conclude, please. Nothing can be generalized. I can't be generalized in this country. It's important that the Brazilian population be attentive to the facts. The big press today is talking about the threat to democracy, the real threat to democracy, that many thought came to be a cotone the army of the Supreme Court, who are rasgating the Constitution, respecting the Brazilian people, respecting this power, respecting the whole Brazil, because of your ideology. Thank you very much. -