Elton Weber

O que é que o Sr. Fabiano e a Francilla pudessem... falar alguma coisa sobre... a minha proposta. ou a minha posição que levantei aqui, da possibilidade... Para este grupo de produtores, uma isenção ou uma forma diferente... no que diz respeito àquilo que foi conversado aqui. Eu queria, Fabiano, que pudesse falar sobre isso. e levar, certamente não tens a decisão talvez hoje aqui, se tiver melhor ainda, mas levar isso à direção da empresa, porque aqui foi dito por várias pessoas: a bairro é importante para o Brasil, é importante para o agricultor, sim, Mas nós precisamos... Agora, da ajuda da Bayer também. É nesse sentido. Obrigado. Mais algum dos expositores.

How do you go? Thank you. Thank you. Oi. Thank you very much, Mr. Heitor Schuh. I want to thank you and thank you for the public audience. I'm here to thank you, I'm here to thank you all the members of the members of Afonso Am, who passed away from here, the entities in person of the President Eugênio. the professor Jurineu, all the organizations, producers, Embrapa, all those who are here. First, I want to say that if we have 21 years, deputado Welter, And the inflation Why not revisise It is crucial. Why not? Because this is the house that can do it. And I think this public audience serves also to give the initial point of this discussion. according to the president of the Hector Chu, to build a group, that the president said before, to analyze all this situation here in this case. I'm not talking about biotechnology. I'm not talking about science, nor about the benefits that exist. We have to re-discutise this whole topic. I remember... Senator Irine Wart, that we, in Porto Alegre, We I was a proponent of that meeting the president of the committee where you said, and I agree, and I agree. And I want to say here that we never In any moment, as producers, I'm going to say, Fabiano, and the team here, we never had a agreement between producers and Monsanto, today Bayer, Do percentual. Acordo, acordo, nós nunca fizemos. Regres foram estipuladas, mas acordo do produtor com a empresa, that would be 1%, 2%, 5% or 7%? Never had. I'm saying this? because I was one of those who, with the FETAG, with the entity, you were already deputy, and many others, Eugênio. that we defend. Asimente. genetically modified. We defended this in 2004. The directors of Monsanto, and also Bayer, they don't have any more in the company. And we defend this. And I give the right here in this meeting, We pedir of proposing and appealing to Monsanto about some situations. I'm going to be a little bit more than I have been here with us. I'm going to be a little bit more than I have been here. Yes, we improve the numbers of Brazilian production and productivity? Yes, we improve. Did you influence in biotechnology? but also the work of the farmer. If the agriculture doesn't plant, doesn't care? If it's not a person, it doesn't work. Excuse me. But that's the reality. We don't have to say that the climate since we started this topic of cobring. Pagamento de cipado. E agora ele assirou. I saw this before the SEBRA. That's the Serialistas. the climate of the balance sheet from the serialist as a producer. The climate of the director of the serialist Arley with people who have been known for years. Grazie. There's more! Or we take a attitude now, and I want to talk about partnership. Or we are a partner. no bonus and onus or not to say that we are a partner Because in the moment when there is the ONUS, and we are currently atravessing, especially in the URG do Sul, but in other states also, We also have to share this. So I don't want to say anything about what was presented technically, but I need to say this, that we need to discuss and make a appeal. and propose to be done. There in the Rio Grande do Sul we are talking about, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention it before, but we are talking about propose to be done. And we can propose here, yes. And I want to say that, what we already said there, Now, what are the reunion? We have to discuss the values. It's not possible to be the values that are placed, nor percentual. I even can't say, Mr. Heitor Schuh, because the proposal doesn't offend, opinion doesn't offend. Why do we don't suspend or the company doesn't suspend the cobring? With all this emaranhado that we have, the test. There are doubts. Ações judiciais are running. Some are already finalized, others are in the end. Why do we not suspend? Why do Monsanto Bayer not suspend? as a sign of partnership to the producer, to the agriculture, What is the first time? Why we, for those who don't pay, I want to say to Monsanto, not create a bonus for who paid For the next safra, we can buy some and insumos in the cereal list. And the year that comes that have a good harvest We are going to pay, without any doubt, and we are going to pay for technology. because I didn't see any farmer to say that they don't want to pay. Now, the way it is this confusion, in some way, I'm not giving a blame for anyone, but I want Fabiano and Francila to make this I'm going to be a little bit of this proposal. Let's discuss the percentual values and, who knows, this is another proposal that may even look like a offense. But I want to make it in the name of our farmers. I want to thank Eugenio for your participation in your statements. We have to take care of this. Because if you don't know, a phone phone, it's a example used. but it's a price, even if it has 1.000 patents. And I hope that in the sector of animals, the gado-leiteer and others, I hope that no one starts to want to buy genetics, because if not 5 liters of leite for vaca... just a comparison, it can be grotesque, but I wanted to call attention in this sense, because we are here in an audience public, one of the most important ones, and we are going to need this question. Thank you, Dr. Hector.

Deputado Estadual-RS, elogia Frente Parlamentar da Agricultura Familiar, destaca importância de agricultores e valorização de seu trabalho, menciona parceria com mundo acadêmico e agradece coordenação do Deputado Heitor Chu.