PLENÁRIO

Thank you. . Thank you. President, I'm tired of hearing here in the Senate, a beautiful speech in pro of professions when we vote for the regulations of these professions. But I never saw, after we approve a regulation of a profession, the life of this professional in practice improve. It's a beautiful speech, it's a popular populism, it's a demagogia, but in fact, no benefit of any. On the contrary, look at this. The text of the project recognizes that today, the doulas that work for more than three years, they are good professionals, even if they don't have a medium degree, even if they don't have a technical degree. Well Now, for the future, this project will establish that the dollars of today, that are in the same condition, will be prohibited from working. because they will need a specific course that the today's not need. So If the text is considered, and I see the contradiction of the text If the text consider that today, a doula that works, three years or more and there's no specific information. is a good professional and can continue working? Because in the future, dollars with this same condition will not be able to exist. And another point. We are approving the urgency of a text that clearly was made on the coxas. And I tell you why. We have an amendment, a constitutional article, which is the 167 paragraph 7, which I constantly invoke in the Commission on Finance and Tributations, which establishes that once we create for the subnation of states and municipalities, which is the case of this project, we need to present a fund of financing. This project doesn't present So this project, like many others that I've seen pass on the House's plenary, If it's a sanction, the Supreme will be going to be arrested with this same constitutional amendment. So, even if you make a text well-made, that will be arrested for the constitutional rights that will not be arrested later. It's easy to come here and make a nice speech, but the text will be thrown tomorrow by any other judge in first instance, in case of incidental or inconstitucionality, or in the abstract control of the federal Supreme Court. Why did they not observe a amendment? constitutional, simple. a simple technique. So, my two main points: first, it's a contradictory text, because it says that the dollar that is good for working today, tomorrow, will be forbidden to work. As new people who are going to be in the same conditions that they were formed today, would be prohibited to work in the future. Second, because that it doesn't cumpre a constitutional amendment on the financing for the subnation and, so, it will be derrubed. Thank you, President. Come on. Thank you. .