COMISSÃO DE FINANÇAS E TRIBUTAÇÃO

Hey. I'm Berlán Solano, my reporter Emanuel Piero. I would like to thank you The other candidates, all colleagues who contribute, elevam the level and the rule of this debate, the deputado Gilson Daniel, the deputado Adair Cunha, the deputado Hugo Leal, Deputy Danilo Forte, Deputy Soraya Santos, And the deputy Adriana Boaventura, who is not present, will... virtual I I'll see my life in the interior of the Bahia. I have a Catholic, conservative form. and I was still still in Salvador, and decide by vocaption to enter the course of Direction. Sempre que I admire the public rights. After I was already born to my city and my vocation led me the public life, two consecutive mandats of vereador. - The first time we have been in the last year, we have been in the last year, and we have been in the last year. after three mandatos of the deputy of the state of the state, And here I meet you in third mandat. I was graduated from the Catholic University of Salvador and graduated the Federal University of Bahia The curriculum that we have to move on is, right? Emmanuel, Emmanuelzinho. So I I would like to say that Ratifico. and I agree with everything that was said here by the deputado Danilo Fortes and also by the deputado Hugo Leal, which elevates the level of this debate. And certainly I will agree with those who will if it was pronounced after me because I have a hope that all of them will contribute to the elevating debate that we will make here in this moment. I can start by discussing the article 70 the Federal Constitution, which is about the fiscalization and control, as competencies, the composition of the TCU. but with the time and wanting to complement the in my legal training, is to say that in our Brazil there are many and many laws. We have several of them weekly here. but all of them are going to be in our federal constitution. Aliás, My dear Rubens, we are sitting at the school of Directors in the discipline of the introduction to the right, the first lesson that I learned is the principle of the hierarchy of the leis, which leads us to respect the Federal Constitution. He in function of this article 60, initially, that is the clause of Petri, which cannot be revoked via the constitutional amendment, only with a new constitution. The first one, the third one, the inciso III, that have to do with this here today, that talks about the impossibility abolish separation of powers. And the fourth one is that of the rights and fundamental rights. And this remet to the 5th article, which is the most important part of our Constitution. that has a series of rights and fundamental guarantees and the citizens. And it's about this that I want to talk here today, especially in a difficult moment that we have lived in our country. No artigo 5º, Do inciso... 37th, which says: that there will not be a court of exception. do inciso 55 that brings the principle of the contradictory, of the broad defense and of the individual legal process. do inciso 57, que fala da presunção da inocência. Yeah. I will I want to demonstrate, especially with my act on this time here, as author of the law project, or relatando, my form of garantist and respect our Constitution. to say that in case the generosity of my colleagues I'll take you to the Union Tribunal The most I would be focused on punishing someone. We have to prevent someone. Because to punish someone, we are in public life, and here in this House there are 84 prefeitos, ex-prefeitos, we have to observe the laws of the Constitution, that are the presumption of innocence, that are the ample defense of the contrary and the indivisible legal process. to say that Today we are having a inversion of values, where you point the finger for the public man, and he is forced to prove that he is innocent. when, if there is a waiver in the court, The public will have to prove that the boss failed and had a dolo. for that he was punished. because the consequences are very serious. whether in the administrative or federal level, in the electoral field that affects everyone and our honor. So this is the principle that will be my life. In fact, I was a reporter the law 14.836 of 2024. in which there was a divergence in the Supreme Court, because of the absence of one of the members of one of the members, that said The impact was in the double pro-societat. or, in a debate, the deputy Rubens has a lot of this, is in dubbio pro-reo. And my report was in the sense that the impact had to be, to be a position of the REL, because the State didn't have a majority. to condemn someone. And so has been my procedure. I, as a member of the Mesa of Directors, We are very accepting that the other powers come to us as members of the chair of the I voted against, with the deputy Altineu and the deputy Sérgio Souza. the mandate of the deputy Eduardo Bolsonaro and the cassation of the mandato of the dep. Alexandre Ramage. all the two deputies that contributed very much to our country, of excellent quality, and that were coaginated to be here present, It was not for their own fault, because they were not here, but they were impelished to leave our country. And I would like to vote in the case of the two cassation of the two, which I think is wrong, and that we are subject to certain procedures that we should not accept. Sobre emendas Parliamentaires. I I would like to say that I agree with what was said by the deputado Danilo Fortes, I agree with the deputado What will I do? But I think that this has happened. a imposition is a reality that will not be back to us. We can not allow because this gave us independence. If it was a government of the right or a government of the left, we can't allow it to retrocede the time. in which the Minister of Relations Institution and the Minister of Governance, who already gave the name of the name of the amendments, authorize and pay a amendment of a deputy who vote according to the government, or not, in which the parliament would live with the hands of the hands of the president. Today, We, in the last government, and today, we already dropped a series of votes. and we can only do it exactly the independence that we acquired from the parliamentary amendments. And This is not contrary to transparency, the rastreadability, we are not against this. This is a problem of the executive, in fact, I already put this in the law. As a I was a reporter The Lei Complementar, dep. Wilton, 210 in 2024 And in the article 7, I'll be in the paragraph 1, that the resources of the Unions, repassable to the other entities by transparency, are subject to this Apreciation of the Conta of the Unions in their terms of the Unions. those terms of your income. And more It imputes equality of the treatment between the amendments and the other despesas of the budget of the executive order. In the article 14, saying that it is vedada the imposition of regra, restription, impediment to amend the parliamentary amendment, that are not applicable to the budget of the budget discretionary of the executive order, here is the saída. Chama o Supremo Tribunal Federal, chama o Ministério Público Federal, chama o Tribunal de Contas, pode trazer a regra que for que nós aqui do Parlamento... We accept On the other side, the executive is going to say if these rules that are being brought they are the conditions of the government, this is their own problem, they are not ours. because everything that could be done by the executive, we accept. The budget is one. There is no budget in the parliament, the parliament, the parliament, and the budget is one. Any regra of transparency, of rastreadability, that there is for the executive, is good. We're going to execute it. What we want is that the resources come to the point. and can benefit people. Because 513 deputies, 513 heads-pensants, who know the interior and the reality of Piauí, my dear President, who know the interior of São Paulo, of Minas, my dear Odai Cunha, have a better capacity than the bureaucrats of ministries, that make, by the criteria, a better and without our own. I put it on the law. that we did, while I was a reporter is absolutely applicable to the case and solve this issue of the amendment. I Here you are. I'll talk a little bit about Gigi. the - Yeah. independencia. Nois We are at the moment, as the President Danilo said here, I think with plenty of propriety, here in this House No one more than me agree, accept, and defend the political agreements. the agreement is made to be fulfilled. And that's why I understand the position of the President of the Câmara, that, having done for his election, political agreement with the party. that is to comply with this agreement of I agree. We are dealing with... of a cargo vitalicio We don't vote for the Supreme Tribunal Federal or the Senate, but we don't vote for the Sabatina. We don't vote for Superior Tribunal of Justice, we don't vote for Embaixadores. This is the only charge that we vote here, establishing vitality, that needs to be independent, needs to be autonomy. And then, my dear... Deputado Hildo Rocha. "Mudeste à parte, seu amigo aqui, Do you? I'm going to prepare There's autonomy I'm going to ask for the president's decision to know what happens to each of the deputies because I was yesterday The last time we voted here for agreement, passamos by a very and illustre minister of the Tribunal of Contas of the Unions, the minister of the Agulina, that was inaccessible to the deputies. That's not right. They need to be sure, by the procedure, by the type of behavior, by the way we conduct, that we will put someone first, because the deputy will not be there to ask anything for themselves. but I ask for those who will be received Totalmente prefeitos. of expenses They are people who have the right to have what the Constitution prescrive, which is a defense, or a contraditório, and be inocentated if the Ministry of Contra not has. the ability to show that they were a dull. And this I have courage to do and being a majority opinion. you of bureaucratic and we have several técnicos absolutely prepared to do the Unions, which is levanted opinion against My colleagues, if you have a chance to vote as important as well as there were in question of riding, in question of joys, I would have to do with independent, but with a sensibility of that we can't be able to be able to be able to be able to be decent men I I the permission to members of the committee that allow me to come tomorrow to look at each other's eyes of the members of this House and say: "Cheering of submission!" not more for us to accept as we are going to be transit in our house, because the Constituição Disciplina my dear deputado Rubens Jr., disciplina that if a parliament is being arrested, in another day we can leave it. And I can't believe one parliamentarian andando with a electronic electronic, because if there's a reason for it to be cast, or preventively, can't be a deputy that can be a plenary of this House of tornozeleiras. How much a woman has 75 years old, that they don't have to be able to flee, that they have family, that they have a friend of mine, and that they don't have to be able to do anything. This is a submission to other powers. And to exercise this type of function, And we are defending our name for indication has to be in the various virtues that were and will be certainly presented here and the other members who will be announced in this moment. a virtue that never left me. and never will be left as the poet said, "because in the lack of them, all the others disappear". Coragem. I don't have a feeling of fear. I have courage, disposition, and desire. to represent this house I'm using it here with a lot of pride, whether you are where you are, because I am a parlamentar with conviction, since 30 years I am in the Parliament from the Câmara of Vereadores, I am passing by the Assembly Legislative, and with much pride member from the BNB. Thank you. Thank you.