Alyne Dayane Pacífico

Thank you. Good afternoon. I'm a professor Dr. Aline Pacifico. I'm a white woman, with black hair, on the waist. I'm wearing a green shirt. I'm already in the area of the Sign Language of the Sign Language for 25 years. I'm a teacher. of course for candidates surdos. a totally voluntary course because I'm a I am a public service. And as I have been for years, with the surdome community, it was a lot of frustration. and not as people, as servidores public. And we started to fight. Let's prepare the surdos? So I started to prepare with volunteers, we created a whole course, totally adapted, all in Libras, and we started to face problems in the concurs. because it's where the surdos will be approved. So, from the lack of material, of accessible editable content, because the companies say: "We have here all the accessibility. We'll look at the editor, deputado. They are avatares. are those completely limited boxes. So we don't have the edital in libras. in video even, as a professional fluent. All the phases of the concurse are not accessible. So, the surdo already starts to be prejudiced at the moment of the inscription, because the entire edital is not accessible. It's not possible to say, but we have the avatars, those little ones, totally limited, they can't pass information. So, I always do the interpretation of the edital voluntarily for the surdos, of the medical records, we need to the banks don't accept the surdos of the lauders, because depending on the audiology, it has to be specified there that they need to be a video-proof. So we had a big problem, I was going to be a struggle here, in the federal district since 2022, where I and the Surda Holand, which I call carly and they already know me, we created a preparatory course, we did the concurso from the Secretariat of Education. and it was not accessible. We entered the public, and the public public said, Aline, the law of DF is prejudicing the surdos, which is the law 4949, of 2012, where it says in the text, "The surdos will have the right to interpret the or a video conference. And the companies They were able to use the interpreters. The interpreters were not able to interpret the whole and only questions, words, the surdo was prejudiced. So we entered with a law, a law, in the Câmara Legislative. I took 620 surdos in 2022, every day, to try to approve a law, and we were able to approve the law here in DF. that guarantee the interpretation and the video test. We just changed one letter in the law. And then we can guarantee it. With this, today we have... as provas nos concursos The Federal District has the video test. It's a advance, we got the Lei 7181 of 2022. No other information, only the video test is on the day of the test. The edital is not in Libras, the resources are not in Libras, and also the other thing, the tests are not available. How will the deaf person prove that he didn't have a video-proof or that the interpreter was... There was no qualification or no fluency if they were not available. All the trials and concurs are published in the same day, but the surdos are not published. So, we have this difficulty, in addition to the lack of material, of banking, of questions, as companies don't hire intérpretes fluents, with adequate quality. And we have this difficulty, particularly, that is the lack of accessibility in all the trials, not only on the day of the trial. and yes, edital, resources, isenção of inscrição, the medical, I passed this with surdos. The only the surdos who had their medical license needed to have a test the use of the video-pros in the day. The students who didn't have the law of the medical word, the word "video-prova" didn't have the video-prova in the day of the Secretariat of Education. The Álvaro also didn't have the law of the medical school. So we had to do a mutirão with more of 60 students, we went to the hospital, the HUB of Brasília, we took it there, and a doctor, he made a law of the normal, where he contemplated the additional time and the video test. And I compared it. It was 110 young people who did the School of Education in 2022. These 110, no surdo profundo passed. When I say surdo profundo, it's the example of Ítalo, totally independent of the language of signals, not oralism, not speak Portuguese. He has only the language of signals as a way of communication. The judge said that really didn't have access to the non-harm, the SUS was prejudiced because they didn't have a video-proof. But in second instance, by the fact that four deficient auditory deficient, oralized, passed, the judge understood that there was a non-harm. four have been able to pass from 110, but when you look, the four are oralized, totally fluent in Portuguese. They don't need help. So, they still are very far away. As things are not happening on the ground. The surdolant is suffering. The surdos are suffering. Because it doesn't come. We can't. I'm here creating meios, trying to adapt material, recording editals, because I have to record the editals because they ask me, Aline, When is the inscription? What do I have to do? What do I need? Because the digital is not accessible. So, the situation is serious. We are serious. really, giving a gun on the hook. What I observe today is that everyone is in a boat, everyone is with a reme, everyone is going to one side. We are not able to go on a way. In the way of this, the public public here, the Federal District, of the struggle that we made, he launched the laws 7, 5, 8, 6, de 2024, que foi uma normativa, onde ele pegou todas as necessidades em relação ao concurso. for all people with deficiencies, and put there what is important. So it's important that we do this to the federal level. That we have a "arcabouço" with all the needs of them, for these companies not find these breaches, that we can secure all the rights. all the needs in relation to the concurso. We need to have a single instrument. That's what I want to say. Thank you very much, Aline.