COMISSÃO DE CONSTITUIÇÃO E JUSTIÇA E DE CIDADANIA

. Thank you. Thank you very much, President, Deputado Leo Lomanto. I want to welcome all the parliamentarians who I'm going to join this meeting. I'm going to join the ladies and gentlemen who, through the communication, also Participando this meeting I want to compliment to the guests Mr. Márcio Aé Corrêa. the andrade sir antonio fernandes santos neto francisco Canidé Pegado Nascimento, Sr. Valier Hertley. that attended to the invitation of this committee. came to this house to bring information and I have a certain point of view that the position of your senhoras will be extremely important, so that we can we can do it again Thank you. within each of us what will be important and decisive for the future of our country. I want to make a special, a presence between us, the deputy Reginaldo Lopes, He was the author of one of the PECs, the PEC 221-2019, which is the PEC-MAMI, this discussion that in this moment has been in the context of the Constitution and Justice. All right. The function of this committee is emit a parecer. especially about the issues related to a constitucionality or not the proposal that is presented by the parliamentarian But I have said, and this is also the understanding President Deputy Leandro Lomanto, that, by the amplification of the theme, by the reflections that they produce in our society, it's obvious that forçosamente esse debate adentri on the issues to having, including, the opportunity to, with this, allow that the Brazilian society that we can, since already, follow this debate, what will be the gains the class of our country will have. and at the same time understand what are as consequences, what are the effects and what measures this parliament can propose for workers and employers can build a text that really represents an advance for the country. for the class of our country and at the same time a conscience that this advance can not be become something that will be prejudiced seja a nossa economy, and the generation of jobs here Brazil. I have said very clearly that I participate in a debate of the importance of the I think reduction of work hours the ...do salario dos trabalhadores. I have a conscience that This type of debate definitely doesn't have prospered. ... "Discutir redução de jornada". and at the same time discusses the salary, means that in the practical we would not be able to We would not be able to move on. in the discussion and in the proposal the to be able to achieve solutions that effectively point to the effective gain of the Brazilian workers. In the same way, I don't understand. I don't convince myself the key a reduction of the work journey, can produce in our country a scenario of a dead land. I understand that the Brazil has enough maturity to discuss and advance in this matter. It's clear that with the cuidados and salvaguardas necessary, for us to give a step to the end, to benefit from clearly the class of our country, but at the same time Adotando as providências que possam de alguma forma give a salvaguard for those sectors which are more intensively that the force of the work have in a size of the impact absorbent the product sector. In these initial considerations, I will make here some questions. seven or eight points to hear the opinion of each of the gentlemen, representatives. for the workers of our country, this debate also doesn't along much, even for that those nobles colleagues parliamentarians also have the opportunity to be here to make your statements and your Questionments. Thank you. We all know that Thank you. The Constitution and Justice discuss two Propostas de emenda constitucional the first of the authority of the dep. Reginaldo Lopes, propõe a redução da jornada de trabalho from 44 to 36 hours. and the second, the deputy Erika Hilton. that, beyond the proposal of reducing the work jornal also the reduction in the constitutional text the scale of work from 6x1 to 4x3 is important that, again once, This is very clear the difference between "Jornada de Trabalho" and scale of work, even for people who effectively I'm going to go this debate can exactly be situated in relation to what is being discussed and what is being asked. I would like to hear the ... and syndicates We started this debate in the context of this committee, initially the Minister of Work the luis mario p in this commission I'm speaking in the name of the government. proposed that discussion and move to an intermediate solution. the proposed Mr. Luiz Marinho It was a reduction of the work hours of 44 hours to 40 hours. and the reduction of the scale which is 6x1 to 5x2 I would like to hear the representatives If they are aligned with the proposal that is presented by the government, or defend them original the 4436 and 6x1 to 4x3. Thank you.