PLENÁRIO

25 mar. 2026 14:14 às 20:27

Sobre o Evento

A sessão plenária foi marcada por uma pauta diversificada que incluiu desde debates sobre infraestrutura rodoviária e desenvolvimento regional até questões de política fiscal e direitos sociais. Os parlamentares discutiram temas como reformas previdenciárias, segurança pública, combate à violência contra a mulher e críticas à gestão governamental.

Status
Concluído
ID: 81424Total: 274 discursos
#207
Transcrição automática

- I hope we'll do it. Thank you. Presidente, The report here, in your explanation, that in reason for the cut of the tax benefits in the past, there would be a tax space for the benefits that he treats, here, as is the case of the Paternary License and Paternary License, and the PIS, PASEP, COFINS. and also the benefits in relation to the free commerce zone. The first point is the following: If there is a tax space, It's not necessary that a law flexibly the tax rules of any way. Because if there is a tax space within the laws that are now rege the budget, not would be necessary to approve a law, as the report is doing, but at Afro-Shah, both the legislation the fiscal arcaboules as a legislation that we approved, we have a little time already revogated or flexibilizing the Lei of Diretrizes Orçamentárias. The cut of the tax creditors different from what the reporter said, is not a source of financing, nor of the license paternity, nor of the free commerce, nor of the PIS, PASEP, COFINS Why? Our law It just can be Fonte de financiamento. of a new budget of law, that that cut, that font of receipts that specifically and iniquity, in its justification, that will finance a certain policy public. So I can only present a project saying that I'm creating a gas, I'm not saying that this project is creating a gas, but I'm just explaining to not be nebulosed what the reporter said. I can only present a project. creating a new spending. justifying this new spending as its source of receipts being a cut of the previous cost, if when, at the time of approval of the cut of the previous cost, was in the project, in a specific way, that the cut of the expenses would be a source of funding for the project approved. And this is not the case of the license paternity, this is when there was a creation of gastos. Here we are talking about flexibilization of regress, which are two different things. but it was not the case of the license paternity, not the case of the area of commerce and not the case is the credit of PIS, PASEP and COFINS. So, President... It's not true. Key There is a fiscal space created specifically for the public policies that we are dealing with here. If it was true, it would not be necessary to flexize the fiscal laws. Because if you're in the fiscal space, If there is space created

25 de mar, 18:57