Marco Aurélio Vieira

... completamente construído o bottom-up. Ou seja, nós temos que ouvir o setor, eles constroem de baixo para cima essa política e a gente já chega com ela pronta lá em cima. Porque eles têm a dor do mercado. Obrigado.

Boom. -Alô. Good evening to all. I would like to thank the deputado General Pazuello, I would like to thank the patience of all of them here until the end. There was a professor who said that when The word finally expressed in It was a way to exercise the religious side, everyone, thank God, God, everyone, everyone, I would be very objective. What was said here, practically, was what we had to present. I just will... I'll remember two or three data. and to put the position of the IPGEM in this problem. The Petroleum, Energy Energy Institute was born exactly with the objective, it is not a think tank, He's not a... a institute for studies, it is a institute for capturing what is happening in the sector of oil, gas and energy, and translate it into propositions legislatively and in contact with the government. Or, to make it that what is normally levant, problem with concern of the sector, transform it into a solution the most objective possible. We We give importance to this audience because here, here, can be a can't be able to get these solutions. Today energy is not just power, as was for example, the Earth. Today energy is a weapon. We have 36, more than 30 conflicts in the world today, and all of them directly or indirectly work with influence the energy, all, without excecção And The small reactors are a topic that is not more periférico, it is a solution that has to be adopted, not only economically and financially, but has to be thought of a strategy and in the national security. all the nuclear programs, all the world, work with the state support. are state programs. The only thing that is not is the American program. But even so, No ano passado. until this year, they already have $80 billion in construction of 10 reactors and US$ 60 billion in the combustion of fuel. So this means that even not being the only country a state-wide development It's a mixture, but the state has a very big weight. What is the solution for Brazil? So here our proposal as a institut It's exactly, listening to the sector, for this I'm just the last to say, what is our solution? I'll go ahead, deputado. We have to take a step back. The constatation that is made is that there is not Uma and a national strategy of energy. When I say in the national strategy, we have a nuclear energy, we have a political energy, but All energies are talking today. So we have to have a national policy and a national strategy. From there, we can start thinking about regulatory marco. Because today the big problem that exists is exactly the marco regulatory marco that they talk about themselves. Perfect. So, the energy regulator is LIMPA! and not talk about the electric energy that invested more than 30 years, and today is with containment, not able to put energy because it is being cut in the period in which more consumption is consumed. So why? It's not a lack of regulatory mark. It's that the regulatory system is not coordinated between themselves. It only can happen after we have a strategy or a national policy. We have, then, need to, in this strategy, and in this policy, of a But... a way to regulate the supply chain, which there is no longer, there was some part of this supply chain, we had to make, we had to make, we had to make, we had to make our products of reactor and how it enters the market, we had to think about a customization in the regulatory framework, of the fact including, as was said here, with intervening the international legislation, we had to think about resources. So, When it comes to a political a political political partidary, a political political super-governmental, we have a constant flux of resources. This flux of resources is not constant. Consequently, no program subsist. No. All of them live the language. - Thank you. We have to continue, therefore, to the program. to win the sustainability of sustainability. The professor said here about the society has to understand, etc. and so on. The society has a huge reaction to the nuclear energy. It's necessary to win this paradigm. I'm... This is the mark but The most important thing of what we have to think about in terms of solution. It's an innovation. We have to have support governmental, and we have to have new models of business. If we don't have new models of business, we don't have to support this is a supplement. Nobody invests if we don't have new models of business, that have a supply chain that is supported over 40, 50, 100 years. Okay? That's what I had to say. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.

Boa noite, Caio. Cumprimentando você pela apresentação. Eu tenho um respeito muito grande... pela EPE, ultimamente tem o baseado muito nos estudos da EPE, em todos os nossos trabalhos, mas eu gostaria de saber de você, E não é uma crítica é uma constatação, nós verificamos que muito do que a EPE produz não é aproveitado pelo governo. Muito do que a EPE produz não se traduz... em algum resultado. Eu perguntaria... Nós temos... Como transformar o que a EPE produz em política pública real? Temos conseguido isso? Pode ter uma pergunta, general. Bom...

Inicialmente, gostaria de dizer que foi muito elucidativa a sua apresentação... E muito estimulante também, ver que o Brasil... Está no caminho... para o desenvolvimento desse segmento. A minha pergunta é: É um protótipo. Consequentemente, teremos um protótipo com... todo o seu funcionamento acontecendo em 2033. Não... Obrigado. 2030. A partir do protótipo Ambicioso Então nós Podemos replicar o protótipo Em 3 anos, é isso? Podemos Essa era a pergunta que a gente ia fazer. Isso, podemos. Então, nós temos capacidade, basta que a cadeia produtiva se estabeleça, nós teríamos condições de em três em três anos entregar uma unidade.