Alan Hassem Salvatierra

Boom. Thank you, Mr. President. the opportunity that you gave us. I wouldn't mention it, but he mentioned this subject. as he said CONASEP was founded in 2022, HajaVista, a mission of who should have represented the professionals. So, we know that unfortunately, because many entities, not all but a large part of many profissioners are used for some questions related to some central to the government So we know how to use of mass of maneuvers, among other situations. Where was Conazep? It was being founded. doing what he did to do. I'll say very simple. The legislative committee was founded in 2001. CONASEP has six, exactly six legislative suggestions that today are made to be made of law here in the house One of them is the PL 5744, which has nothing to do with uniform. It's a crime to try to consume a contravia of the vigilante. My question is very simple. Qual sindicato apresentou a law. call sindicato of the workers, I'm not talking about the patronage, I'm talking about the workers that have a The Conazep has no obligation. The Conazep doesn't represent the private security, it represents its associates, as well as the JUF represents its judges, as well as the National National Council of the Brazil represents its magistrates, the National National Council of the Republic represents its procurators. The CONASEP represents their associates, which, thanks to God, today, which is a totally gratuitous affiliation, we're going to have more than 600.000 associates. So, the number, in itself, already talked about. So, this situation is this. We are here to represent our associates who are with this with these issues. So, my question is very simple: where, so, since there are 30 years, I've never seen 30 years, 10 years, or since 2001, any project of law, any one can do it. CLP is open, any association, federation, confederation. can be registered in a way gratis, to present to work for that this is done. So, where are you? The question goes for you. Where are you? Where are you? Where are you? Thank you, deputado.

Thank you. Thank you, Captain. always the pro-atio in defense of private security, civil security, and all the times we look for working together about the pout, the cabinet always has the right to do you. I'm going to thank you all of you here on the table. And were mentioned points. very good. I understand, by one hand, Um, However, we do CONASEP We understand that The new, the new, the security of privacy, as well said by my ancestors, for more than 16 years, 15 years, I'm going to be trampled. So it was already created in a very obsolete situation. I say that something even retro-agir. example that in 7.102, in the old law of privacy, in the 19th, 2nd or 3rd, previa a special prison during the service. Or, if the vigilante had a armed reaction, if there was any situation, he had a special prison. the which was removed. So to our view, to the defense of the PANASEP, a a a o estatuto da segurança privada ele visa muito mais para as empresas than for the private security professionals. could have been made situations point-of-the-art in question to keep something that already existed in a special prison. We could have done other situations. I'm not saying here that there was no significant advance. There was, yes. There was an exceptional work but what could have been done for the professionals, I'm talking now about the physical person, the vigilante, could have been done, but it was not done. and not for lack of tentative, not for lack of this, We tried, but always when something came to do atrapalhado. Unfortunately, as you said at the beginning, because of this government some situations that happen Yeah. We should defend the professionals. I'm talking about the professionals now. CPF. those professionals, not so did it. So, that's why we are working hard to do it. in this way. For example, the issue of the origin. and civil bombers in events. The vigilantes exist. They are there. And as there is no regard to the work do trabalho em si, de segurança, de grandes eventos, porque são muitos eventos que estão sendo feitos. No any state I repeat, there is no one that an event vigilante according to the collective convention It doesn't exist. You can go now, to any event here in Brazil. No estado do Senhor, it's worse. they are receiving 70% less than what is expected in the CCT. to receive one week or two weeks later and the deslocation they have to be paid on their own wallet, among other things. So this is a aggravating of the entities that should represent and defend the professionals, So they do not do. So various work, and also the QSJ, right? We have no rest. We were... I've done a work here in the verification. that the work that were made by the levantment of the public public 10th region Thank you. where it was degraded, an analog to the slave. because the vigilante had to enter into a chemical bathroom to do your food. He didn't have to go to the bathroom in any place, he had to go to the chemical bathroom, we have documented photos, videos, he had to go to the bathroom bathroom for the bathroom, for the event. We are vehement against the clandestinism, which is the biggest cancer of the private security. people totally prepared There are many situations where we are here do Conazep, we had several reports of people who were in prison, doing security events here in Brasília. Like a prison open. So, this is because of what? Of the clandestinism. This is because of this. There must be a higher qualification. We defend ourselves, at least here in the reality of the Federal District, I don't know a company that is here, vigilante, that doesn't have at least the degree of teaching. In other states we can see this situation. So, the qualification, the formation, this is fundamental. We never fought with this. We fought with the omission of some... representatividade entidade que deveria sim fazer e sim não fazem e é por isso que nós somos uma We here at Corazep, we are a association We don't have this obligation, but we are trying to do Aquilo. For example, the PL5744 Okay. of the thanks to the work that you did with CCJ Né? We approve it. We are ready for voting in plenary, which makes crime a hard time to be able to consume the victim's life in the exercise of her function or in reason of her. And her parent's co-sanguina is at 4º. Right. It's a work that was made, a suggestion, oriunda from the legislative number 30 of 2023. approved by CLP of the Autority of Conazep. So it's what we're trying to do here. And thank you again once again. by the work that Mr. is doing, this sub-committee I had the joy of being present thanks to your request, thanks to the approval of all the work that you've been doing, to be really effective. I was even talking about it, I was saying, "What is that going to change?" I hope you will see the big difference. This has been the first time in the history of the Republic. There was never a sub-committee of the security and the civil security. It was the first time that it existed. thanks to the work of the senhor and all the deputies that have been doing. So we have to to understand that the professional vigilante, Deputado. just last year, because I'm not already president of Conazep, I'm ex-president. Just last year I applied 147 Eh... "Motion Honrosa Pós Mortem" of the guards that they were killed in their positions. This was what I was assigned as a when I was still president of the Conazep. 147 suicídios. not mortes, suicides. where the issue of the work degrading, where the issue of moral assedion sexual between other points that is being made and put in it, but we have all this documented. Everything is done in a way that is not a common thing. the vigilantes who have not lost their lives, because they have their duty Dentro dos padrões, com uso progressivo da força correto, mas aí o meliante, ali com uso de álcool, com uso de outros produtos entorpecentes, He expected the vigilance to leave. and the "Mator" if it was your life. So it's a question of the port of the weapon. for the vigilante to be able to do this defense of his own life. In especial, data-vena, to the whole understanding of the Supreme the vigilante has a law that determines that he receives 30% of periculose. He spends his life working and receiving periculose, but he doesn't get married because of the danger that he was working. It's even incongruent, it's even Né? It's a little bit of connection. and And the PL2480 I believe that in the text that you have done, that was the one who made this substitution in the work, and I believe it would help and very much. - Yeah. in at least a analysis we can say, more cuidadosa in the administrative position. Not that they will give it to the court, but as the question the PEC, what the President said, and it's bringing in a process the Constitution. So other point that I'm going to bring very important here the civilian and brigadiers. There is a big discrepancies. I was invited, the people from the bomber, I don't know why they didn't come, but it's okay. There is a problem is crucial in this It's a bit strange. Because the civil bomber and brigadier are two different values. many are hired to exercise the duty of civil bomber, but receive as brigadistas. as well as Oh, doutor. It's gasto, right? He spoke about the issue of the courtiers, of the fees, of the fees, of the fees, okay. but the contractor requires you to have a vigilante a prerequisite for you to exercise. So it's very easy. I want you to exercise the function It's the same thing as a teacher of the enfermage, but I want you to be trained in enfermage. Bachelorette in Enfermage. So, there is this situation. If you are, for example, the portefeu where I live, He, one of the... five employees who work there, they say, "the exigences are the CNV, but he is contratable with a employee, but the company obliges that he has the national security of his and reciclage of his and everything. But he's been hired as a porter. So, this question is very important. because a fiscal I don't know if there is any specific training, a doctor, or a lawyer, or a situation like that. Because the vigilante passes through a rigorous training. It's not any one. that can be a vigilante. If you have any criminal antecedents, there is a psychotic test. and even we defend that should exist a little more of some information specific, not in the intent of bringing a problem of formation, but to enrich the formation of these professionals so that they can do their work in their work in the best way possible. So this conjunto of situations, these problems atinentes, is what causes We have panic, let's say, the Conazep has only 3 years, but it's been doing. in great situations. We have a lot of... It's a part of the political policy, it's part of the divergence, but we are here to defend the workers. not to say that defend, but to defend it. It's totally different. who should be doing, not did. But we understand that, unfortunately, in this government, It's a little complicated to advance in certain pautas. special, port of a gun, among other things. and and I believe And I would like so as the requirements, I'll just leave here expressed. if this audience could be encaminhada to the public work here in the 10th region. Conazep is doing a work in together. to start to do a BF-A-N-A-N-A-L about these irregularities. to events to a party, There's a blog. a bar to start to do a levantment. to show this reality not only the issue of salubrity, in some cases, even analog to the scrabble, of this degradation that is in the preface, so that we can do it. It's a request that I make here for V. Ex. if so it was done. Thank you. .

O Presidente do Conselho Nacional da Segurança Privada - CONASEP defende o direito ao porte de arma para vigilantes como medida de autodefesa, solicita melhorias na regulamentação de calibres, apoio em demandas previdenciárias e o aproveitamento de exames profissionais para agilizar a concessão de porte, além de destacar a necessidade de políticas para a saúde mental da categoria.