COMISSÃO DE CULTURA

- Bye. Thank you, President Carol D'Artora. I'd like to thank you for taking this place I respect and admire your duty. And I feel honored. of being here, under your seat and your presidency. I ask the authority to go direct to the reporter. and whenever I read a report I'm going to be able to talk about my condition, which is a subnormal view that doesn't depend on the lens. So if I have any difficulty, it has to with my own conditions of a normal view, but I always can finish the reading. I also have 8 degrees of hypermetropia. I have this difficulty since 16 years old and I don't correct it. It's a condition of life, but I can always do it. Thank you for understanding. The principles of freedom of faith, the statement of the article 5, the Constitution, are of the most sublime importance. This command, however, does not make explicit the separation of the action of the State, that the action of the religious manifestations and religious manifestations. Recently, we reported cases of intolerance and violence "The question is, " between the conditions of a citizen and the condition of a religious confession. In other words, we need to be more explicit. in the distinction between the official and state of that is englobant of all citizens as well as detentors of rights and rights and the religious and confessional, that recognizes the right of each one to adhere and practice his faith, which, in the meantime, is private, private, private, private. Then, the cab of the proposed here examined, that is to be able to establish spaces to reflect on the strengthening of the state of theic. However, contorned by the hand of the that cause inquietude between members and directors of various confessions. For example. It's perceptible that the symbols of the Catholic faith still present in the most diverse fields of public space. in legislative plenary, in places of destaque of the judicial and the executive court. Inclusive, it is common to find images of Jesus, of Nossa Senhora and of other saints in schools, for example. This condition is comprehensible in a country where the Catholic faith predominated. for more than 500 years of its history, which for a long time was known as the biggest Catholic country in the world. However, as we grow up institucionally and gain visibility of other religious confessions, we have a new look at new questions. In this sense, we can formulate the following raciocínio: "Yes, the presence mass and even exclusive of cimbals católicos in public spaces is a result of a long history process, but how can we, without being menospreised by cimbals católicos, we can confront a deeper reflection about this phenomenon vis-à-vis the state of the law? We, for example, evangelicals, whose proportion in the composition of the Brazilian population is growing, would be the reason if we were to plead that in these spaces were exposed the symbol that condensate and unify our faith, for example, the Bible. This logic would also be applied to our brothers of faith, Jewish, Jewish, as well as religions of Afro-American and indigenous, even minor. The respect and the right of space to convictions religious beliefs should not be subjected to demographic considerations. In the same reason, I would like to see citizens who declare not to be a religious confession and say that there is no religious symbols in the official spaces. It is a reflection where there is a place for many not, yes and why. We, as a responsibility to maintain and improve our democratic state. This requires, among other things, the task of defending a state economy, in relation to the religious confessions. This is a condition for, at the time in which we affirm and we profundize our faith and our religious confessions, we continue to be respected and tolerated with the faith of others. This is not a case of precipitating a laicism intolerant. We have seen countries ocidentals obliging moças of families of Muslim families to wear the ocidentals to enter the school. "Seguramente, não somos e nem precisamos deste tipo de radicalismo. Nossa cultura é caracterizada pela sociabilidade cordial que prima por evitar a afronta." cordiality that has a couple of signals, sometimes, a "saudable" because, evitando radicalizations, permit them that the status quo It evolves slowly, but with more stability. This is also a way to encobrate social conflicts. It's this that is the law of 3.061, 2025. This proposes, respectfully, that we can build a space and a time in which we can reflect with more profundity about the significance, the limitations and the virtues of a state explicitly laical. Now, we have a proposal in relation to the 2nd of the Ley of 12.345, of 9.08.2010, which, that, we have a proposal for a institution of commemorative dates and preconize a procedure relative to the audience public, as a condition for approval of the proposal relative to the matter. Transcrevemos. . . . However, the understanding of the Director of the House, in the House of Questions of Ordens nº 26025 and 262.25, both refer to the PL nº 6.366, 2019, is that the absence the audience, even in the phase of deliberation, the plenary, is not a reason for the proposal to be assustated, since, being a process legiferous, bicameral, the audience necessary to approve the proposal can be made in the House Revisora, in this case, the Federal Senado. Transcrevo note of tax gráfic. Mr. President Hugo Mota. I understand that the requisitions required by the Ley 12.13. 12.345 de 2010, devem ser satisfeitos ao longo da tramitação legislativa bicameral. Então, obrigatoriamente, antes de ser aprovado no Senado Federal, deverá ser realizada uma audiência pública na casa vizinha. Por todas as razões expostas, nesta análise, nos manifestamos pela aprovação com a emenda do Projeto de Lei nº 3061 de 2025. Então, é pela aprovação, parabenizando o autor, and then open up briefs comments, just to guarantee the approval. I don't know if it can be this way. Thank you.