Yomara Ribeiro

and the noble speaker that is presiding this session, so really in Santa Catarina it's a reference state in good practice, but that's because this process of rehabilitation was always extremely rigorous here in our state. this conduct of fiscalization always was present. I've been following this process for more than 20 years here in our state, and along the years, we were placed monitoring in the classes, today we work with biometrics, with fiscalization, so every difficulty that the student has, he knows that he has to report to the director-geral, to the director of teaching, which are figures that were extint of this process of habilitation, So there is a technical and pedagogy that makes all the support of the candidate and a very rigid, the DETRAN here in Santa Catarina. of the policy structured of viability in Santa Catarina. There are some risks, especially between motorcycles, in the weekend, in fact, we know that this is related to the habit of people. And that's why I understand that the formation should be even more advanced, we have to have the process of teaching and learning, that it should be done in a transit school. I think that from the moment we start to analyze the education for transit, and the form of the conductors are seen as entities of teaching, I think we change a lot. Because I think everything changes in our country, and we can advance a lot if we change the cultural issue, education, everything. So I think if we start from this principle, we have, yes, the possibility of changing the reality of our transit. For example, what is happening here in Santa Catarina today. When the issue of the classes, I think it is fundamental for the issue of auditory, control, quality, and security of the instructor and the student. Even to avoid corruption practices. Because this... It brings transparency, jurídica for the process. And the value of the ICFC as part of this formation. We know, deputado, that the DETRANS today don't have the conditions of all of them. Maybe instructors. So today there is a CNPJ that respond if something happens. If, for example, some instructor doesn't minist the class and this is detected in the audit of the DETRAN, autoescola corre o risco de perder o credenciamento. E essa é uma preocupação real, e eu tenho muito essa preocupação de como será feita essa fiscalização, caso seja extinta a figura do Centro de Formação de Contorno, through the resolution, how will be done this process? Because a person who is credence here in Santa Catarina, tomorrow, can change to state, and who will be responsible for the damage caused by society? So, if this person decides to simply stop the issue, who will be responsible for the damage? So, I understand that. cameras are important, yes, it's important to have an auditory, but it's important to have a structure behind these instructors, which are the Centers of Formation of Conductors, which already have a prior fiscalization, before the DETRAN.

Please. Good afternoon, you hear me well? We are listening to you, Elmara, be welcome for 10 minutes. Thank you, Mr. President, Coronel Meira. - and and the authorities present and all those who follow us on the Câmara Federal channels. Good afternoon to all. So, today I will ask you to make a license to be firm and expose the reality. because who is treated the transit with suaveity still didn't understand the gravity being decided here. So, Mr. Relator, I'm going straight to the point and I would like to direct the gentleman to the gentleman I would like to ask you to reflect on the question, if you would like to have a child of 18 years old, if you would like him to be a child with someone who would like him to be prepared, without a form of consistent, without a double command or without any supervision, and look at his eyes and say, "I can't, if the worst happens, we will be in the fight with the lute later." you what will be decided in this commission, not only gives a person, but only gives a person. It gives a person to the destino of thousands of families. The question is not if the system should change, but who will pay the price when the absence of control is going to find the asphalt? The structure that today exists in the center of the control system, it has not been for a accident. by the employees of the sector, very contrary. So before some say in mafia of schools, We need to understand the context. This structure was imposed on the long of the years by Senatran and by the regulatory organizations, which exiged to the CFCs, a sala of classes, a director-geral, a director of teaching, a adequacy, two cars, two cars, one director-geral, one director of teaching, two instructors and he didn't stop by there. the same states, along the time, also increased even more these requirements. Or, created a robust structure, complex and cost. This account inevitably needs to be absorbed in the process of form of contours. So when someone says that a bill is car, we need to have responsibility and honestness to say that it is car and bureaucratic, because the federal government so decided. If we had a real, concrete, technical, today the Center of Formation of Conductors, through studies that we did, even in the past, a study from SEBRAE, the CFC has 10% of liquid lucro on the value of the cost. Or, if this is not the CFC, we are talking about companies that support employees, pay tribute, Tributos, invests in estrutura, tecnologia, manutenção, não é uma atividade simples, mas é uma atividade essencial. E aqui eu quero quebrar esse mito que é repetido com muita facilidade. There is no mafia of auto schools. Any person who wants to open a training center of control, a school can do, since they can do legal requirements. There is no barrier, there is no reserve of market. these people need respect. The Center of Formation of Conductors are not companies, they are, in their essence, institutions of teaching that lead with lives, because the National Carteirian Habilitation is not a right. We have to understand it as a concession of the state, and every concession requires preparation, responsibility and conscience. When someone takes the wheel, What is this vehicle driving? It's not just a vehicle, it's a vehicle with a potential of killing. And without preparation, this vehicle stops being a vehicle and becomes a weapon. And that's why the formality is not a detail, it is a barrier between the security and the chaos. The Código of Trânsito says that the security of the state is a right and a right and a right and a right. It's a concrete, it's a concrete, it's a objective. And when this responsibility is related, the result is not theoretical. It's real. The system collapse. The Sistema Único of Health costs billions of dollars every year with victims of transit. And I'm not talking about numbers, I've been living for three months in a routine of a unit of the accident. And I can say without any doubt, the SUS is at the limit. If you look for the SUS today for a treatment, you'll be going to get a vaga. And there's something that needs to be very clear here. system with a leveza. A accident doesn't end in a collision, he continues, he continues in a limitation of a body that doesn't respond, in a rent that disappears, in a house that needs to be adapted, in a family that needs to be rebuilt, in a empty cage of who doesn't return to your house. And when we understand this, there's no more space to treat education for the transit as a burocracia. And it's at this point that appears the discourse sedutor, saying "we're going to facilitate, we're going to baratear" words that sound good, "we're going to give access to all habilitation But let's be honest honest, this doesn't pass from a populist discourse, from a electoral election, and we are close to the election, and this can't be. The security of people, the lives of people can't be played every election. different. In many countries where the process of rehabilitation is more flexible, there is a culture consolidating, of respect to the laws, greater sense of collective responsibility, of the fiscalization efficient and education of base. And in Brazil, unfortunately, it is common to tolerance with the issues of respect to the rules. The impacience in the trance and the idea of that dirigir is only a practical ability, and and not a act of social responsibility. So when we talk about the process of rehabilitation, it's not just a process, it's not just about cost, it's not just about flexibility, we're talking about lives, and lives don't admit error. is inevitable question: who can respond when something is wrong? Thank you. Today, in many cases, this responsibility is being transferred in a silent way to the student. He pays less, apparently. but he assumes the risk that Siquelis We are seeing several accidents every day by people unprepared, people with double command trying to administer a class. And then when something more serious happens without a effective control, it opens space for what no one wants to admit. even after cases of assédio. Here I speak as a woman also. This is admissible. "Inapeat, without a fiscalization, without a total control over the classes, over the learning process." This is not an advance. This is a retrocess. And when we talk about inclusion, what is seen in the practical is a even more exclusion. Deputado Auro, a pessoa com deficiência hoje enfrenta um dos cenários mais injustos do processo de habilitação. Antes havia uma exigência de estrutura adaptada. and this responsibility was filled with me. And I ask who needs to adapt to the vehicle, will initially invest 20 mil, which is a vehicle adapted for complete, before even knowing if it will be considered apt to be This is not inclusion. This is a barrier, a abandon. without mentioning that they talk about people with less power acquiescent, but these people are totally excluded because they don't have a car to learn. they don't have a car to train, and they will have to pay even more classes. Or, all this is a discourse disfarced for... privilege to have a vehicle for those who already have a vehicle because people who have less conditions also don't have to train properly. if you do it correctly or assume the risk. And in the transit, this risk has a name, is accident, is death, So what is defended here It's not this retrocess by the resolution 10/20. What we also don't want is the rigidity that you had. We want a balance. And I think that this is the central point We want, yes, a fair and fair, but with real training. We want supervision in the classes, responsibility, control, because at the end, this decision of this committee, it will not be just technical, It's moral also. Because what kind of transit we want? A cheaper or safer transit? And I end And, back to the reporter, that this decision today today, the next audience, it doesn't get limited the Federal Câmara She will be on the streets, in the crossings on the vehicle side, on the motorcycle back, And tomorrow When someone comes home, It will depend directly from the quality of this decision. So I invite all of them to form this process to reflect. Because in transit, a error will not be just a error, it's a life that cannot return. Thank you very much. Thank you.